N.C. Wyeth, I think that is what Bob Hritz was trying to say. All of these gentlemen Bob, Jim , John Pepera....many more old time collectors knew about put together tunics...but I do not think they knew that it had reached the scale it has reached. Nobody could really come right out and say these things were faked unless they bought and owned and examined more than one...thats how good they are.
I owned one Kai Winkler tunic that had no signs of being a faked at all...except that it was as new as if you bought it at the tailor yesterday..no wear not even one tiny stain and the collar tab piping was so glitzy new that when compaired to that on other tunics it would glisten from across the Pamona show room where I had it on a mannequin..at that Show I bought my Thule tunic which when compaired you could see the real differences between an original and a newly assembled piece..and the Thule was in near mint condition..but showed the age a real tunic should have. I also looked at a Tunic there that Gus Villareal brought and is in the Beaver book...same differences in the age factors of the insignias depite them being in perfect shape they did not shine like diamonds as on the Winkler tunic.
I owned one Kai Winkler tunic that had no signs of being a faked at all...except that it was as new as if you bought it at the tailor yesterday..no wear not even one tiny stain and the collar tab piping was so glitzy new that when compaired to that on other tunics it would glisten from across the Pamona show room where I had it on a mannequin..at that Show I bought my Thule tunic which when compaired you could see the real differences between an original and a newly assembled piece..and the Thule was in near mint condition..but showed the age a real tunic should have. I also looked at a Tunic there that Gus Villareal brought and is in the Beaver book...same differences in the age factors of the insignias depite them being in perfect shape they did not shine like diamonds as on the Winkler tunic.
Comment