Heraldry
\
Hello JC,
About the Crest...that is very helpful.
About the rules of Heraldry, I had read and been told about how every differant principate had it's own rules and variant meanings...but I am willing to re-research and re-evaluate my previous info...it sure would make it easier to follow the "standard" heraldry rules.
And as to the possibility that the two runes are not bind-runes but conforming to haraldic standards...well that is a interesting and welcome thought also.
I agree it fits as a possible SS initial monogram in runic form .
It is this kind of input I hoped to solicit .
Also thanks for getting this thread back where I prefer the focus to be.
--Michael
Originally posted by J C Gray
View Post
Hello JC,
About the Crest...that is very helpful.
About the rules of Heraldry, I had read and been told about how every differant principate had it's own rules and variant meanings...but I am willing to re-research and re-evaluate my previous info...it sure would make it easier to follow the "standard" heraldry rules.
And as to the possibility that the two runes are not bind-runes but conforming to haraldic standards...well that is a interesting and welcome thought also.
I agree it fits as a possible SS initial monogram in runic form .
It is this kind of input I hoped to solicit .
Also thanks for getting this thread back where I prefer the focus to be.
--Michael
Comment