I have followed this thread with a combination of emotions ranging from surprise to shock to outright disgust. I'm not new to German helmets. I have been studying them for years off and on, and have owned a few in the past. What is new for me in the last couple years is an income that will permit me to perhaps actually buy some items that were only in the dream category a couple years ago. I study the books, study this board. I download and study pics of decals good and fake, of proper chinstraps and liners. Have two file folders on my computer, one with known fakes, and one with some of the known good ones posted here. Or are they?
I was looking forward to comming home next year and meeting some of you at shows ect. And getting the best education available on helms which is handling good ones.
Does this mean I now have to ask "Was this bought from Ken?"
I don't know Ken. I don't know any of you. I don't know any dealers at all, and very few fellow collectors. And I certainly hope at some point Ken will come forward with a truthful explanation. But from the evidence, he is aware of this issue and hasn't steped forward.
I will continue to study this part of my hobby. I will continue to enjoy it regardless of this type of sorry situation. I will continue to ask you guys questions and build my data base. And next year when I come home, will VERY CAREFULLY begin building the small collection goal I have set for myself.
But this type of thing is going to eventually ruin this hobby, and destroy the value of collections that a lot of good people have built up over the years. Now we are going to have to establish not only the provenence of the helmet itself, but also which dealer it came from.
Perry is right to keep this thread going. Perhaps it should be pinned for future reference.
OK, I'm off the soapbox. And thanks to you honest guys for providing the info we need. Even if it is alarming and painful.
Best regards,
Johnnie
I was looking forward to comming home next year and meeting some of you at shows ect. And getting the best education available on helms which is handling good ones.
Does this mean I now have to ask "Was this bought from Ken?"
I don't know Ken. I don't know any of you. I don't know any dealers at all, and very few fellow collectors. And I certainly hope at some point Ken will come forward with a truthful explanation. But from the evidence, he is aware of this issue and hasn't steped forward.
I will continue to study this part of my hobby. I will continue to enjoy it regardless of this type of sorry situation. I will continue to ask you guys questions and build my data base. And next year when I come home, will VERY CAREFULLY begin building the small collection goal I have set for myself.
But this type of thing is going to eventually ruin this hobby, and destroy the value of collections that a lot of good people have built up over the years. Now we are going to have to establish not only the provenence of the helmet itself, but also which dealer it came from.
Perry is right to keep this thread going. Perhaps it should be pinned for future reference.
OK, I'm off the soapbox. And thanks to you honest guys for providing the info we need. Even if it is alarming and painful.
Best regards,
Johnnie
Comment