For reference can you post photos of the reverse too.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AH flatware
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Hi Torsten,
I agree with Fredy; this doesn't look good to me, even without seeing the reverse. Genuine AH Formal Pattern pieces have sharply squared ends to their handles, and the eagle and initials look like a poorly-cast copy to me. For reference, take a look at Brent's Antiques website for good pieces of both the Formal and the Informal Patterns.
Cheers, my friend,
Br. James
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Fish View Postjust looks well worn actually rather than fake? perhaps having a look at the reverse will help. I've not seen any copies anything like that , have you guys?
Comment
-
I'm sticking with my previously-stated opinion, but will find the reverse of the handle worth a look, too!
Regardless of the amount of buffing and polishing that this piece may have taken...or not taken, if it is a fake...the corners of the base of the handle are too rounded off as compared with genuine examples of the AH Formal Pattern. And that would not have been effected by zealously over-buffing over time.
Br. James
Comment
-
No doubt about that, CPB. Lets see what the handle's reverse shows us.
In my experience, it is quite rare to see an example of AH silverware in either pattern that appears to have been greatly worn down due to excessive polishing, as this piece portrays. Indeed, if such wearing away of the pattern would have taken place during it's use in the TR, such a piece would have been sent back to the retail jeweler as inferior quality! So that is a point of interest. But the corners of the handle's base continue to tell the whole backstory, as I see it...
Br. James
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 23 users online. 0 members and 23 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment