Originally posted by Glenn McInnes
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Officers Wool M43 Cap
Collapse
X
-
Jim, as one of the people who acquired one of these Army M-43 officer's caps directly from a vet, I think I can probably put this debate to rest. Approximately ten years ago, I acquired a foot locker that belonged to a doctor (a Major I believe) of the 44th Infantry Division. The foot locker contained his uniforms, paperwork, a camo German helmet, a Panzer NCO overcoat (I still have this) and a mint example of the exact M-43 cap that you have posted. From what I recall, at the end of the war, the vet wound up in Czechoslovakia, where I believe he acquired this cap from a factory. I unfortunately sold the cap shortly after I acquired it. Over the past ten years, I have seen a couple more examples of these caps at shows, but they weren't fast movers because of a lot of skepticism about their originality. Anyway, that's my two cents. Your cap is a good one and if anyone else sees one at a show, snap it up, because it's an unusual, original variation.
Barry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stormfighter View Post...as one of the people who acquired one of these Army M-43 officer's caps directly from a vet, I think I can probably put this debate to rest. Barry
I would still like one though (as long as it were cheap).
B. N. Singer
Comment
-
Originally posted by B. N. Singer View PostSorry that doesn't do it for this skeptic!
I would still like one though (as long as it were cheap).
B. N. Singer
I also forgot to mention that I had the capture certificate for the cap.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stormfighter View PostA hat that came directly from a vet isn't good enough evidence? I guess I'll have to find the factory worker who assembled it . . .
I also forgot to mention that I had the capture certificate for the cap.
B. N. ("The Joker") Singer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stormfighter View PostA hat that came directly from a vet isn't good enough evidence? I guess I'll have to find the factory worker who assembled it . . .
I also forgot to mention that I had the capture certificate for the cap.
But its been an interesting discussion and I hope we can continue it in a friendly manner. I can understand Mr Singers position, but at this point we can agree to disagree. A healthy skepticism is good for the hobby. In the end the hobby isn't a science and each individual will have to make his own decision as to the originality of this style hat, based on the information provided.
WR Jim
Comment
-
Originally posted by B. N. Singer View PostOK fellows, "riddle me this Batman," why is it, that when these hats first made their appearance in the collecting community (to my experience) they were ALL unissued Mint and now when you see examples most have had wear (in some cases extreme)?
B. N. ("The Joker") Singer
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike Davis View PostOK 'Joker', ...Are you saying that all of the dispersed mint caps have been worn by various individuals to 'break them in'? I think that is a bit of a stretch don't you? Maybe I don't get your point!
B. N. Singer
Comment
-
I was over at Bob Hritz's today and he had this eagle in one of his riker mounts. Its not exactly like the one on my hat but definately the same manufacturer. The biggest difference is the bullseye, the color is salmon. This one was used and you can see the stitch line if you hold it up to the light. Also this ones full sized. Apparently mine was cut down before it was sewn on. Oh Bob also said it was a direct vet pickup. WR Jim
FrontAttached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by billbert View PostAnd some still refuse to believe...Billbert
The insignia from Bob is a one looker.My pictures don't do it justice.The white on the front is really an off white from age. Nice musty smell we collectors all look for.
WR and Happy New Year. Jim
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment