Sorry Robert,
I also have to give this one a
due to the odd mix of fat and thin fonts and bad RZM stamp.
I also have to give this one a
due to the odd mix of fat and thin fonts and bad RZM stamp.
-
-
Ok thanks jnobleOriginally posted by jnobleSorry Robert,
I also have to give this one a due to the odd mix of fat and thin fonts and bad RZM stamp.
Comment
-
I have to agree with James. Sorry..... MikeComment
-
I can see the differences to original onesOriginally posted by Mike Dunn
,will be more careful next time. perhaps I should think of a novel way of destroying it !, to try for a years free membership!!!
thanks
Robert
Comment
-
RE: Authenticity Of NSDAP Party Badge (M1/72)
Hi there,
i'm emailing all you collectors regarding a NSDAP Party Badge that i acquired from an Ebaye seller. I suspect that its an original piece but im open to any comments from you guys whether if it IS really is an authentic piece and the current market price for it. I bought it for US$40. Really appreciate for any help given. The statistic on this badge is that:-
1)Pre-1945 government party pin
2)An inch in diameter - the back is not flat but concave.
3)There is a small wartime repair to the white enamel
4)The clasp is in working order, and it attached to the base with a fine metal base plate
5)The back has a slight bronzed look to it, and the three lettered licenced product logo is present
6)The maker mark of M1/72 is quite clear. The M1 represents a metal pin, and the 72 is for the firm of Franz Lipp of Pforzheim.
The reason that i suspect it to be original are:-
1)The back has a slight bronzed look to it, and the three lettered licenced product logo is present (note: the Z has a line throught it...a good thing)
2)The front has fine translucent red & all lettering is correct...including "O" that are perfectly round...another good sign!
Well any comment guys???Market value????See the pics below.
Front picture Of Party Badge
Back picture of Party Badge
Sincerely,
Ibrahim.
Singapore.Comment
-
Yes your badge does look like a good one the only thing you got wrong is the LDO code 72 is for the firm of Franz Lipp of Pforzheim where as your RZM code M1/72 is for the firm of Fritz Zimmermann, Stuttgart. these are two completely different lists. I also have to add that it looks like the attachment pin may have been replaced at one time. Other then that you did good.
I will add your's to the list on page 8.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->Comment
-
NSDAP membership badge
Hi, here is a membership badge I had for awhile. It is marked ges gesch and a faint 75. The white enamel has faint cracks but does not show up on the pic due to the flash from the camera. What is your opinion on this one? Thanks, DELComment
-
NSDAP membership badge
BackComment
-
Badge
I don't like this one...the O and the spacing between some of the letters like the i between the t and the s of socialistische...
Comment
-
Sorry Del from what I can see of this pin I have to agree with TerryG.
Comment
-
NSDAP membership badge
Hi, here are some better pics. Unfortunately, I didn't get to take them outside and they are still with the flash. DELComment
-
NSDAP Membership badge
Back of badgeComment
-
Nsdap
Well, I sure hope that you are not thinking of becoming an official Royal photographer or that you are not going to be the only photographer of the Bush campaign...
.....I am trying to break it to you gently......not the best photos ever, are they? Still looking dodgy to me.
Comment
-
NSDAP Membership badge
Terry, I appreciate the humor but can you tell me how to take better pictures? DELComment
-
Nsdap
I felt in a silly mood, I hope you did not take it the wrong way. I am no expert by far...look at some of my shots . I guess "all you need" is a digital camera with macro setting and good ambient daylight...or a scanner. Maybe you can borrow a freind's?
Comment
Comment