Originally posted by Dietrich Maerz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Knight Crosses today.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sepp45 View PostBut John, thats my point. This is at least something; some light into the history of Ritterkreuzträgers. I beg the moderators no to close or delete this thread; it has taken me months of research. Let me continue this investigation that I'm sure will bring more satisfaction and joy to all of us, than rather be a bad database.
Originally posted by Sepp45 View PostI have a question to all collectors: if you tell me that there's no substantial claim for some RK's, where's the substantial claim that says otherwise? I mean, perhaphs sometimes is better to trust a felling or willing to accept that REALLY is the RK in question (until proven otherwise, of course).
Originally posted by Sepp45 View PostHow sure can you all be about your own RK's then? How can you trust the one you hold in your hand, if it takes a miracle (for some) to really, really believe that's the KC of a brave soldier?
So as Dietrich has said - please continue.
John
Comment
-
Ok, let's continue. I'll still try to do my best. If pictures you wants, pictures you get. From now on, when I post "RK awarded to...", we'll just asumed that is it, until prove otherwise.
RK awarded to Oberleutnant Helmut Harnack
Source: http://fecom.creatuforo.com/1-tema2705.html?start=0
OL awarded to Romanian General Mihail Lascar
RK awarded to Standartenführer Alfons Rebane
Sorry I coudn't get some better pictures. This was taken during his burial, in Estonia.
The RK and others awards are currently on the Lakewood archives, Estonia.
Source: http://alfonsrebane.webs.com/autasudjaauastmed.htm
Thanks to all of you for the kind words.
Comment
-
I echo this. Thank you very much for your efforts, Sepp. I have enjoyed this thread very much, and please continue. In my field of scientific research, we categorize our research by levels of evidence with 1 being a double blind study and 4, a review of the literature. One is the most valid in its results, but 4, which would be similar to what you are doing, is very valuable as well just in a different way. Whenever I consider an attibuted grouping, I do a net search to see if the name or cross comes up in the results. If so, I question the validity of the KC's history. I considered one cross from a dealer that I found was also in another collection listed on the internet. I bought the cross, as it was a nice original S and L micro 800 with a nice 3 oclock beading flaw, but paid the price for an unatrribulated cross to the dealer as he couldn't provide provenace. By doing what you have done here, it does contribute to this internet database and could be useful. You are not trying to make money from this, your aren't tring to deceive anybody, you are simply searching the net to collect as much information as you can for your new friends in WAF and saving me the effort of doing it myself.
Thanks again for your efforts,
John
Comment
-
Originally posted by dornhoffer View PostI echo this. Thank you very much for your efforts, Sepp. I have enjoyed this thread very much, and please continue. In my field of scientific research, we categorize our research by levels of evidence with 1 being a double blind study and 4, a review of the literature. One is the most valid in its results, but 4, which would be similar to what you are doing, is very valuable as well just in a different way. Whenever I consider an attibuted grouping, I do a net search to see if the name or cross comes up in the results. If so, I question the validity of the KC's history. I considered one cross from a dealer that I found was also in another collection listed on the internet. I bought the cross, as it was a nice original S and L micro 800 with a nice 3 oclock beading flaw, but paid the price for an unatrribulated cross to the dealer as he couldn't provide provenace. By doing what you have done here, it does contribute to this internet database and could be useful. You are not trying to make money from this, your aren't tring to deceive anybody, you are simply searching the net to collect as much information as you can for your new friends in WAF and saving me the effort of doing it myself.
Thanks again for your efforts,
John
Regards,
Sepp
Comment
-
Many great arguments brought forward here this afternoon!
Personally I would consider an 'AFFADVIT' by the award winner incl. photos of the item as a good proof of provenance. This includes the confirmation of a notary public.
And even that will not necessarily be 100 pct water tight.
I think the healthiest way to collect KCs (which like John M. Donovan I don't) is to separate oneself from the 'collector-fantasy' of believing that the cross one has was in this-and-that battle, dangling on the neck of a certain KC holder. The reality is usually different: A LW cross in a WH group and vice versa.
Better to enjoy the crosses for what they are and not fall for wanna-be-true collector fantasies. This way one will not be disappointed to much. Many times we collectors want to believe so much in a story/an item we start to believe our own lies I guess.
Again, an 'AFFADAVIT' would be my personal choice to feel best about the origin of an item, incl a certain remaining risk.
Saludos,
Markus
Comment
-
Let's continue:
RK with OL awarded to Korvettenkäpitan Bernd Klug
This nice RK belongs to WAF member ChrisJ
Source: http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...ht=RK+grouping
Regards,
Sepp
Comment
-
Originally posted by borodinenko View PostSepp very good job. I appreciate and I repeat, it's a feast for the eyes. continue like that.
I also thank WAF member Markus for aiding me finding Michael Wittmann's RK.
RK with OL, Swords and Diamonds awarded to Hauptsturmführer Michael Wittmann
Regards,
Sepp.
Comment
-
The positive and interesting detail with the Wittmann group here is that it includes an AFFADAVIT from the widow. A letter (posted below) and seperate detailed photos of the awards, signed by the widow (as can be seen on the previous photos).
It's obvious though, reading the letter (in German) that someone prepared it for the widow for her to sign. She signed in good faith, but IMO did not know what she was really signing.
Anyhow, we know that these awards came from her estate and that at least the oakleaves and the OL&Swords were sent to her via HStuf. O. Günsche for replacement purposes after her husband's death in Normandy. It's highly unlikely though, that Wittmann wore these awards imo, as it states in the letter she signed, when he burned up with them in his Tiger.
Anyway: The Affadavit is the key here and in IMO the way such a group should/must be documented.
Cheers,
Markus
ps. The formal award document to the swords was not part of the group which came from the estate.Attached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by markus View PostIt's highly unlikely though, that Wittmann wore these awards imo, as it states in the letter she signed, when he burned up with them in his Tiger.
The medals were taken by a farmer who burried them in 1944, and are still in normandy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Craig Gottlieb View PostI think the Wittmann group is the single best RK grouping that exists. Didn't know he was awarded the Diamonds ... I am sure that is a typo.
is surpassed by far nicer ones of SS personalities in the past 3-4 years IMO.
Comment
-
It's just personal opinion. The real "awesomeness" of the group are the documents and photos. I've flipped through Wolfe and Hardin's binder of these documents, and they are amazing. Photos of Hitler, signed by Hitler, of the Oakleaves, and the Swords (if memory serves) being awarded. Telegrams from Himmler. Original photos of Wittmann just minutes after battle (you can see a very confused and shell-shocked Wittmann).
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 10 users online. 0 members and 10 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment