Originally posted by bubble
View Post
Other than the comment that the shade is slightly off for it to be war time ordnance paint...(not taking in account age, exposure, UV, low quality unstable war time primer paint etc..)
The reasoning can go both ways...but again why do these exist?
This one was sent to me by another member today...the storage rings are interesting since it is a ground find... perhaps really bad quality ersatz paint and even with short term storage the paint had issues? He feels its an overpaint...some LW blue showing....better images to follow! (so perhaps an "apples to pears" comparison)...but shows bad paint quality...an ersatz ordnance primer!
but anyway it does prove further that ordnance tan colored helmets were worn outside of North Africa-DAK...like those SS troops in Greece were wearing in 1944,
but the question remains unanswered: are those overpaints or refurbished, ground up tan helmets...Still very intriguing...The Polizei Division vet seems to remember his Prague depot obtained helmet was entirely tan...not a field expedient job done in-theatre!
but I agree it's not solid proof...I agree with the naysayers... but to close this thread would be a shame...
Feedback is coming in from all corners of the collecting community! The Czech collector opinions and NZ vet accounts (from Italy front) could have good value connecting these dots further!
Let's try harder!
Comment