Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NCO Career Insignia
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by John Robinson View Post
That being the case, m16283's assumption of the German equivalent have the Range Finder's specialty badge makes good sense.
I'd assume therefore to see some variation of the following insignia: rating patch for a Feuerwerksmaat or Oberfeuerwerksmaat, along with the Sonderausbildung Abzeichen (specialty badge) for Entfernungsmesser.
Best regards,
---Norm
Comment
-
The FC/FT rating would have operated this type of computer during WW2. It was developed in the 1930s.
It was called the MK 1A and was a very good gear driven computer. Lots of dials with handles to match up and it was extremely accurate. Naturally, as the gears wore out, you had to to rely on the skill of the FT to introduce corrections to known errors. The Weapons Officer and Gunnery Officer, along with the leading FT, would sit down and apply pen and paper corrections for all kinds of variables prior to actually firing the guns which would then be introduced into the 1A.
Once the gun fired, the gunnery officer, normally in a fire control director, would apply visual corrections to the fall of shot. FT's would also be in the director as well as the fire control rooms within the ship. They also had the responsibility of repairing all this equipment while the gunner's mates had the responsibility of the weapon itself.
Usually a ship preferred firing a drop ranging ladder, which was 3 rounds in the air with the first round the furthest away, the middle round hopefully on target, then the next short. Then you would correct with one shot, then fire for effect. When I say all three rounds would be in the air at the same time, that is what I mean and you trained the gun crews and FT's to do this.
I understood from Army officers that some liked to fire the first round on target, correct, then fire for effect. Different circumstances of course for the Army in the field since you are not moving. A ship is.
I think this computer was the best one of any Navy in WW2--at least that is what I heard. If you look at a photo of the fire control system of HMS Hood, you will readily see the difference in concept remembering that the IA was used for guns up to 8 inch only. Other computers were used for the bigger guns.
JohnAttached FilesLast edited by John R.; 08-27-2012, 07:35 PM.
Comment
-
John, Norm,
Thanks for taking the time to reply to me. I have tried to find info on KM fire control personnel and the rank/career/specialty badges & insignia with not much luck. To me this is especially frustrating since KM's reputation for accurate gunnery. Someone had to point the guns and I know they must have had a system with trained personnel similar to the US. I guess there has not been anything translated yet that would shed more light on it. But I do appreciate you help!
My dad was a FC in Fire Contol Main for the USS Missouri. He was on her from commissioning through the surrender and left her in early 1946. His training in the navy led to a career as a Electronics Technician for over 35 years. The computer you showed and the MK8 range keepers were still in use when the Iowa's were last in service and the navy said they could not improve on them or make them any more accurate. He was very proud of that!
I am really getting hooked on the KM specialty insgnia. Thanks again for your help!Last edited by m16287; 08-30-2012, 08:44 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by m16287 View PostJohn, Norm,
thanks for taking the time to reply to me. I have tried to find info on KM fire control personnel and the rank/career/specialty badges & insignia. To me this is especially so since KM's reputation for accurate gunnery. Someone had to point the guns and I know they must have had a system with trained personnel similar to the US. I guess there has not been anything translated that would shed more light on it. But I do appreciate you help!
My dad was a FC in Fire Contol Main for the USS Missouri. He was on her from commissioning through the surrender and left her in early 1946. His training in the navy led to a career as a Electronics Technician for over 35 years. The computer you showed was still in use when the Iowa's were last in service and the navy said they could not improve on them or make them any more accurate. He was very proud of that!
Thanks again for your help!
It was a reliable and very accurate device but it still needed men who could operate the thing and fix it. Not always such an easy task.
John
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 4 users online. 0 members and 4 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment