20th century Battlefield Archaeology is still in its infant stage and has only been slowly accepted recently and reluctantly as academic archaeology to be honest. Many archaeologist still pooh-pooh it as not being "real" archaeology. The most notable work has been on WWI Battlefields by British and mixed Nationality teams. One notable WWII example was a study by Texas A&M on the German Fortification in Normandy and a Marine survey of the ocean bottom around Neptune Beach.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient...water_01.shtml
http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/org12-7k.htm
When you deal with journalists it is sadly normal for them to disregard most of what you tell them and to essentially hear what they want, make things more dramatic, change content even when you provide them with written summaries etc. This happens all of the time. I wrote an article once for a Journalist, she edited out the most important content, changed the facts and published it as something hard for me to even recognize.
I disagree with the want of fame and stardom. Most professional archaeologists want to not be in the lime light and not be hounded by reporters etc. For me, excavating human remains is the last thing I want to work with. We only do it in North America in cases where Highway construction will destroy human burial areas or if there is an unintentional discovery and a burial is half exposed in a construction wall. As far as I am concerned Craig is Joe Schmo and so are the other people doing this. I do not care who they are. If they want to go out in the forest and dig up mess kits in the mud and rain with a case of beer fine, but when you work with human remains that is a very different matter especially when you are posing with leg bones and skulls like they are newly unearthed toys.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient...water_01.shtml
http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/org12-7k.htm
When you deal with journalists it is sadly normal for them to disregard most of what you tell them and to essentially hear what they want, make things more dramatic, change content even when you provide them with written summaries etc. This happens all of the time. I wrote an article once for a Journalist, she edited out the most important content, changed the facts and published it as something hard for me to even recognize.
I disagree with the want of fame and stardom. Most professional archaeologists want to not be in the lime light and not be hounded by reporters etc. For me, excavating human remains is the last thing I want to work with. We only do it in North America in cases where Highway construction will destroy human burial areas or if there is an unintentional discovery and a burial is half exposed in a construction wall. As far as I am concerned Craig is Joe Schmo and so are the other people doing this. I do not care who they are. If they want to go out in the forest and dig up mess kits in the mud and rain with a case of beer fine, but when you work with human remains that is a very different matter especially when you are posing with leg bones and skulls like they are newly unearthed toys.
Comment