Here's my salty Estonian Volunteer tab (with unterlagen) and stitching also going straight through the buckram. It was done!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SS runic collar tab bullion runes opinions needed
Collapse
X
-
re: Estonian EM tab
Nick G-
Very interesting to see that tab-it occurs to me that this method of stitching might have been done for another reason than just speeding-up production. This process fully joined the front surface design of the tab to the buckram backing, in a manner that was inseperable, barring total destruction of the tab. With the earlier and more common method, the embroidered piece of wool was done separately, then cut and wrapped around the buckram base, and the two components could later be totally separated. This 'thru the buckram' method was probably both more efficient and produced a sturdier finished product. Perhaps if the TR had lasted longer, this method would've eventually replaced the earleir separate production method.
Comment
-
Knots
Originally posted by Ian Hulley View PostI've NEVER seen knots tied in the ends of an original bullion anything, no amount of excuses/speculation will convince me that that embroidery is real.
Ian
Comment
-
Buckrum
Originally posted by John Pic View PostI agree I see the knot at the bottom of that picture obviously it was done.....but who would strip the buckram off a good tab just to see that?
Comment
-
oops-see page 174 of Beaver Insignia book
As a result of this discussion, I perused the above-captioned book, page by page, and discovered in the chapter on tunic-removed insignia, that I DID display a photo of the reverse side of the runic tab, showing the stitching coming right thru the buckram backing. It was my hope that seeing a documented example like that, would add to the knowledge of collectors who had not seen this done before.
BTW, you can still buy the book via paypal, at this link:
http://www.101airborneww2.com/books.html
Comment
-
For what my posting in this matter might be worth,
here is my 101% original, straight from the hands of veteran who brought it back.
If you want the full story of how it was picked up just let me know. For now however, you can judge the item but I swear on the bible and my mothers grave that this was made before May 1945,
Chris
Comment
-
For me there a no doubts that this method of stitching through the buckram was done! The shown tabs are very nice examples good to see some more tabs used this style.
But back to the tab, opened the thread, what do you think about this one finally? especially the style of the runes (shape etc.) and the buckram backing? Like I mentioned before, the buckram reminds me on those you can usually see in NSKK tabs, so I would have some doubts this was done period..
Comment
-
buckram removal
Originally posted by Peter Manzie View PostI have a few nice original tabs with the buckrum missing or removed. At times the tabs were sewn on without buckrum to make them conform better, I assume?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostTabs sometimes had the buckrum removed to make them more comfortable on a field tunic.
What is important about the tab in question is the shape of the runes and the dimension/propoertion of the tab itself.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment