EpicArtifacts

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Untouched TK NCO tunic + crusher visor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Mike Davis View Post
    What a fantastic tunic - and it is very interesting to note the many significant modifications made to this issue M42. I truly appreciate the opportunity to see these little details.

    It is posts like this I think of when someone tells me (as happened a couple of times at The MAX last week) that the forum is a waste of time.

    Many thanks for sharing these images Patrick.
    You´re welcome, Mike - but unfortunately its posts like the one in #29 that keeps one away from posting rare stuff like this in the future...

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Mike Davis View Post
      It is posts like this I think of when someone tells me (as happened a couple of times at The MAX last week) that the forum is a waste of time.
      Yes indeed Mike, the opportunity to see sets like this, which for most would not happen without WAF, do make WAF VERY worthwhile.

      About the comment at the Max, guys who say such things are either jealous or bitter. Or both!
      Esse Quam Videri

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Naval Enigma View Post
        ...?

        It appears the tunic is not the uniform in the wedding photo.
        Why do you think so, if I may ask?... Not something I would necessarily conclude from that thread...??

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Gran Sasso View Post
          You´re welcome, Mike - but unfortunately its posts like the one in #29 that keeps one away from posting rare stuff like this in the future...
          I apologize if I have misspoken. I was basing what I said off another another post. I have no knowledge of the vet, the group or the tunic aside from what is on the forum.

          It is a wonderful tunic and I would love to have it in my collection. I know how difficult it can be to share one's collection to the slings and arrows of the internet. Please do not let a random statement on a message board prevent you from sharing more great pieces.

          Comment


            #35
            IMO the Tunic and Hat is exactly the same as you can see on the wedding photo. Absolutely no doubt!
            Seems that i was 32 years to late.

            Regards, Christian

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Naval Enigma View Post
              It appears the tunic is not the uniform in the wedding photo.
              Just had a long phonecall with Christian (malborghetto), he confirms that it is this tunic and cap.

              He even has in his pocession written proof by the vet himself, that he had sold this tunic and visor back in 1978 for 300,-DM. The vet was after money all his live, and noted everything he spent or earned.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Zauberflöte View Post
                Why do you think so, if I may ask?... Not something I would necessarily conclude from that thread...??
                I was responding to an earlier and now edited post by Malborghetto that stated he knew the widow and daughter and that the tunic was sold stripped. That post has since been edited.

                I retract my statement and apologize for the thread derail.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Naval Enigma View Post
                  I was responding to an earlier and now edited post by Malborghetto that stated he knew the widow and daughter and that the tunic was sold stripped. That post has since been edited.

                  I retract my statement and apologize for the thread derail.
                  No worries - in the phonecall it just came to light that the wife has thought so (that the tunic was stripped, but I guess she was referring to another one, or the greatcoat shown in the linked thread).

                  He was so proud of his service in this division, as we see him wearing his original medals all the time at veterans-reunions, he would not hav stripped the tunic. Actually he got many problems during veterans-reunions form his comrades, wearing his medals with uncovered swastiaks. He dont gave a damn.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Gran Sasso View Post
                    No worries - in the phonecall it just came to light that the wife has thought so (that the tunic was stripped, but I guess she was referring to another one, or the greatcoat shown in the linked thread).

                    He was so proud of his service in this division, as we see him wearing his original medals all the time at veterans-reunions, he would not hav stripped the tunic. Actually he got many problems during veterans-reunions form his comrades, wearing his medals with uncovered swastiaks. He dont gave a damn.
                    Outstanding. I'm glad you guys could connect and establish more information about the set. Again, congratulations.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      When there is photographic evidence and it can be traced back to the Vet it is sealed deal. I loved the other part of the grouping and now with this it is fantastic. I agree perhaps the daughter was referring to the overcoat having the insignia removed?

                      Comment


                        #41
                        SS tunic + visor with photo evidence back to the war. One of few in the world I think

                        DeMil

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Nice tunic. Congrats. I hope you still have both of your arms and legs
                          Can you make a good scan on the belt-hook-holes-area in the wedding picture? In the comparison pictures below, it seems the distance from the pocket to holes is a bit different.
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by bnz. 42 View Post
                            In the comparison pictures below, it seems the distance from the pocket to holes is a bit different.
                            Its the same, easy to be seen by the lower hole wich is a bit out of the line (to the right) in comparisson to the others:
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                              #44
                              They match up perfectly to me, when the tunic is worn it will appear slightly different than when it is flat. Even the uneven placement of the lower belt ramp can be seen, it is slightly out of line with the two upper holes. Everything IMO matches up perfectly. This was the first thing I looked at.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                Could we see the interior of the cloth-billed crusher? Of the originals I've seen, it appears that no two are exactly alike...

                                Comment

                                Users Viewing this Thread

                                Collapse

                                There are currently 9 users online. 0 members and 9 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                                Working...
                                X