Philly,
Thanks for the new photo! It's much better, and confirms my previous statement. The "Ku" marking is definately bogus. The two dots over the "u" are way too large! Also, they look very sloppy, and the "K" should be taller than these two dots. Please see the photos on page one of this thread of the "Ku" luger markings that I posted, and you'll see what I mean.
Also, the serial number looks very un-even to mean. I would have to see more photos of the rest of the gun (serial numbers, and markings), but I would be highly suspecious of this one.
Matt
Thanks for the new photo! It's much better, and confirms my previous statement. The "Ku" marking is definately bogus. The two dots over the "u" are way too large! Also, they look very sloppy, and the "K" should be taller than these two dots. Please see the photos on page one of this thread of the "Ku" luger markings that I posted, and you'll see what I mean.
Also, the serial number looks very un-even to mean. I would have to see more photos of the rest of the gun (serial numbers, and markings), but I would be highly suspecious of this one.
Matt
Comment