Not saying you guys are wrong, but comparisons of the two are two different examples totally. Is it possible , as summized on other threads that hardware was manufactured and jobbed out to different makers. The badge seems to have a lot of personality, age, and such, regardless of the pin, this is a tough one to crack. The obvious fake doesnt have that pressed ring around the back edge , seen on originals, and it would be interesting to see the same pin on another fake anyway. The pimples under the red enamel are totally different, lettering too are very different(even their spacing) , maybe james noble can weigh in, as he seems to have a handle on these regular badges opinion wise. I can't say for sure why they dont match regarding pin, and badge markings.
but the points of all the different opinions ,are all worth considering .
The M on the RZM almost touches the R on the fake and does touch the Z(not like the other one which has even spacing), the M looks different in the M number, the 2 'S ARE different totally in style, just pointing that out, and the safety hook is shorter on the one that started the thread than the obvious shiny faKE.
but the points of all the different opinions ,are all worth considering .
The M on the RZM almost touches the R on the fake and does touch the Z(not like the other one which has even spacing), the M looks different in the M number, the 2 'S ARE different totally in style, just pointing that out, and the safety hook is shorter on the one that started the thread than the obvious shiny faKE.
Comment