Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_4e1495bfdd4079be4515ea4ab7b7a634c5357ec7b06b380b, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Gau Munich variants...how do yours compare? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
FlandersMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gau Munich variants...how do yours compare?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Gau Munich variants...how do yours compare?

    Fellow member Jamie (jscott) and I were looking at some minor variations in the Gau Munich badge. Perhaps you can take a look at your GM and let us know if it has any of these attributes and even post pictures. We hope to discern how truly rare these are and Jaime can update his GM article on Mike Pinkus' website.

    First up on the list is a variation on the swaztika that looks like 2 swaztikas (one on top of each other) that are not exactly parallel and are slightly off kilter or 'separated'. Giving the impression that the swastika is 'moving'. Two extreme examples are known (one extreme is shown, the other example is a standard 1 swastika model) but other examples with varying degrees of 'separation' have been identified.

    Second, is what looks to be a maker's mark seen on some of the Deschler & Sohn marked badges (see photo for mark's site). Actually, when present, only a portion of the mark is visible (see examples) and never in its entirety except for one recent example (or at least it appears almost complete). The most important question would be (1) do other complete or more complete examples exist; (2) is this a known mark for a manufacturer or actually for anything? (3) does such a mark signify or mean anything special?

    The remaining attributes should be self explanatory as shown on the attached photo. Feel free to ask questions and we look forward to your responses.

    Tony

    #2
    Nice thread. Here is my GM, and it's unmarked except for two small lines on the reverse. s/f Robert
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      pic 2
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        pic 3 - this is the only visible mark - s/f Robert
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          Round 1933

          Robert,

          Thank you for your contribution. In fact, yours is well documented and is in a 'class by itself'. Three unique characteristics are apparent (1) the tops of the number three in '1933' are rounded and not straight; (2) the swastika arms are narrower; and (3) there is no "Deschler..." makers mark.

          Check out Jaime's article for more details. Which by the way is presented as a single JPG file for easy portability, so you can save it to a local drive and view with any imaging software or internet browser.

          Comment


            #6
            My example has the non rotating Swaz. It has an umlaut over the U and no 9 after Munchen. Mine is what I guess would be called text book. This badge is my favorite due to it's history!

            Comment


              #7
              Entasis
              An excellent thread thanks for all information on a well underated award in my opinion.
              Many regards
              Shaun

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by ShaunM
                Entasis
                An excellent thread thanks for all information on a well underated award in my opinion.
                Many regards
                Shaun
                I agree, an excellent thread and interesting observations on the maker markings by Tony.

                Comment


                  #9
                  If anyone doesn't want their Gau Munich badge anymore, I would be happy to buy it I like to put them on SA uniforms, and could use a couple extra.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Tony, numbers 4 and 5 in your examples may not be actual varietal differences but may be due to die wear or filling.
                    Richard V

                    Comment


                      #11
                      umlaut

                      Richard V>

                      Die wear can certainly explain the missing umlaut and even the '9' missing in some. I've not done a comparison analysis to determine if the umlaut version is associated with other characteristics but it would certainly be interesting to find out. Nonetheless, if the umlaut portion of the die wore down, wouldn't some parts of the letter 'U' also wear down? Something to consider I guess and look out for.

                      Tony

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Anybody know where there are any for sale?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          You sold one a month or so ago

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Yeah, I know I did. I guess I should go back in time and buy it from myself!

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I think both Weitze and Winkler have one for sale.
                              Richard V

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There are currently 6 users online. 0 members and 6 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X