Oct. 1, 1938 bronze medal

[FW 200]

I have what I believe to be an unfrosted bronze Oct. 1 medal. Is it any good, however? Thanks, Charlie. Bronze on right

[FW 200]

the back

Notice that the ribbon is a quarter inch narrower than on the frosted medal.

[FW 200]

the sides

Also notice that the bronze(tombak?) is a millimeter thinner.

[FW 200]

Has anyone ever seen one of these in bronze or unfrosted tombak before? Charlie

[mrg]

Hi Charlie have had a few of these in my time and maybe its the pics but i am not that keen. date does not look right and the lettering looks wrong, and more spaced out than normal. Ribbon loop has a mordern look it. Thats just my opinion, lets see what others make of it. All the best

[Inspector Krogh]

More detailed pictures are essential for any kind of opinion...
G.

[FW 200]

more pics

This is about the best my camera will do, sorry

[FW 200]

the back

reverse

[FW 200]

one more time

again bronze on left

[FW 200]

the back

backside

[FW 200]

side view

side, bronze is noticably thinner

[Inspector Krogh]

I opine that the medal shown on the right in posts 9 and 10 is definitely NFG.

G.

[mrg]

Hi charlie thanks for the better pics but i am sorry to say i still dont like the lettering. I would say for me.