I have what I believe to be an unfrosted bronze Oct. 1 medal. Is it any good, however? Thanks, Charlie. Bronze on right
-
-
the back
Notice that the ribbon is a quarter inch narrower than on the frosted medal. -
the sides
Also notice that the bronze(tombak?) is a millimeter thinner.Comment
-
Has anyone ever seen one of these in bronze or unfrosted tombak before? CharlieComment
-
Hi Charlie have had a few of these in my time and maybe its the pics but i am not that keen. date does not look right and the lettering looks wrong, and more spaced out than normal. Ribbon loop has a mordern look it. Thats just my opinion, lets see what others make of it. All the bestComment
-
More detailed pictures are essential for any kind of opinion...
G.Comment
-
more pics
This is about the best my camera will do, sorryComment
-
the back
reverseComment
-
one more time
again bronze on leftComment
-
the back
backsideComment
-
side view
side, bronze is noticably thinnerComment
-
I opine that the medal shown on the right in posts 9 and 10 is definitely NFG.
G.Comment
-
Hi charlie thanks for the better pics but i am sorry to say i still dont like the lettering. I would say
for me.
Comment
Comment