Very nice EK2

[RKarum]

Got this from a member and wanted to share some pictures. It will add a slightly different dimention to the crosses in the collection as I didnt have a cross with the "frosty" frame but now I do.

Ring is marked but I can't make it out.

Looks to be unmessed with...not cleaned, core not repainted.

Thanks for looking and added comments.

[RKarum]

Suspension loop slightly bent, no big deal to me. Ring still connected and maker marked, just can't make it out.

[RKarum]

After viewing the ring with a stronger loop and sunny outside conditions the marking appears to be 92 for Josef Rucker & Sohn.

[sanya13]

92 maker not made EK2 ,the pictures very vague ,but for menot like it this the cross

[Douglas 5]

Odd maker mark : looks like a post war type mark ? The last number is a ' 2 ' - .
The first number might be a "3" ? - Legit 2 digit numbers ending with a 2 are : 22 - 52 and 92 ..... which it does not match .
The EK2 seams to be a standard S&L type . So to me an "added" number post war .

Douglas

[RKarum]

I did see that 92 is a legit EK2 maker according to the data here on the WAF.

I will try to get a better photo of the maker later tonight.

[Yubari]

core looks as S&L so lets see what maker mark shows to us - if legit or postwar.

[boch_62]

It's probably Boerger (=22)

Regards
Jareks

[RKarum]

Sorry for the long delay. My camera skills are crap and this is the best I can do with the camera I have.

Now it looks more like 93 and not 92.

[boch_62]

I am trying to judge the cross, not the illegible (from pictures) signature. Signature in crosses Simm & Sohne "93" is block (as in "my" photos) and a small ring much thinner ... but I can be wrong

Regards
Jarek

[Yubari]

looks like 93 now