Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_890cea18b2d74d82594c5dd98e4ba1b54b7eb7750278915c, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Very nice EK2 - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
GermanMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Very nice EK2

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    Very nice EK2

    Got this from a member and wanted to share some pictures. It will add a slightly different dimention to the crosses in the collection as I didnt have a cross with the "frosty" frame but now I do.

    Ring is marked but I can't make it out.

    Looks to be unmessed with...not cleaned, core not repainted.

    Thanks for looking and added comments.
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
    #2
    Suspension loop slightly bent, no big deal to me. Ring still connected and maker marked, just can't make it out.
    Attached Files

    Comment

      #3
      After viewing the ring with a stronger loop and sunny outside conditions the marking appears to be 92 for Josef Rucker & Sohn.

      Comment

        #4
        92 maker not made EK2 ,the pictures very vague ,but for menot like it this the cross

        Comment

          #5
          Odd maker mark : looks like a post war type mark ? The last number is a ' 2 ' - .
          The first number might be a "3" ? - Legit 2 digit numbers ending with a 2 are : 22 - 52 and 92 ..... which it does not match .
          The EK2 seams to be a standard S&L type . So to me an "added" number post war .

          Douglas
          Attached Files

          Comment

            #6
            I did see that 92 is a legit EK2 maker according to the data here on the WAF.

            I will try to get a better photo of the maker later tonight.

            Comment

              #7
              core looks as S&L so lets see what maker mark shows to us - if legit or postwar.

              Comment

                #8
                It's probably Boerger (=22)

                Regards
                Jareks

                Comment

                  #9
                  Sorry for the long delay. My camera skills are crap and this is the best I can do with the camera I have.

                  Now it looks more like 93 and not 92.
                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                    #10
                    I am trying to judge the cross, not the illegible (from pictures) signature. Signature in crosses Simm & Sohne "93" is block (as in "my" photos) and a small ring much thinner ... but I can be wrong

                    Regards
                    Jarek
                    Attached Files

                    Comment

                      #11
                      looks like 93 now

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next

                      Users Viewing this Thread

                      Collapse

                      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                      Working...
                      X