EK2 L/12 on the ring ,

[sanya13]

L/16 ek2

[sanya13]

EK2 mm L/15

[sanya13]

and I did an example with a mm L/15
here yet the mm there was no was same direction
whereas one is inward the other looks outward

[sanya13]

a example with a

"""and I did an example with a mm L/15
here yet the mm there was no was same direction
whereas one is inward the other looks outward"""



not do I understand why your opinion has changed
because since when I found this type of cross and got pictures of it
you wrote to me that " will for sale this the L/12 on the ring " piece that you care about the cross
, but it was expensive to you & to me too
(therefore yet always have this the piece it is with my collecting friend his )


I do not write more on this subject, but I am happy to answer

[boch_62]

Hí Jarek

some example

L/16

Hi Sanya,

It is very difficult to talk if someone does not understand what the other person is talking about. You do not understand what I mean, sorry

I am not talking about the missing parts of the signature whipped on the ring. This is obvious and normal !

I do not accept as a normal, lack of symmetry one-time do signature on the ring, but it should be.
The lines should be parallel, and they are not, and that's all.
And please give me peace in this matter because you will not convince me anyway
I have seen too much in this topic for many years

Jarek

[sanya13]

Hí my friend
I don't want to convince you and I also respect your opinion of course

but IMO mm same that and the marking would be deeper ,would be visible whole number and the base of the number 2 number would be straight

this my opinion ,but I wrote the owner that and ask that send new and better pictures to me

Have nice evening ,my friend, and I always I like your opinion and your comments