EK2 L/12 on the ring ,

[sanya13]

Hí guys

a German my friend sent these pictures to me " whether you care about me " , what do you think about it ??
the pictures not the best ,but just these have it .

[sanya13]

here is the pictures about the mm

[Thomas E Hansen]

here is the pictures about the mm

I think that the “1” looks a bit strange?

Br. Thomas.

[sanya13]

Hí Thomas
here are a old post about the WAF :
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=924547

I think that the “1” looks a bit strange?

Br. Thomas.

[Thomas E Hansen]

Hí Thomas

here are a old post about the WAF :

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=924547

I think this cross, has another “1” than the cross in your second tread.

Let’s think. It’s seems like two different tools, on such a rare marking.

[sanya13]

I already had asked,new and better pictures about the cross and the mm

I think this cross, has another “1” than the cross in your second tread.

Let’s think. It’s seems like two different tools, on such a rare marking.

[boch_62]

In my opinion we meet two types of "L/12" signatures on Juncker's EK2-1939 cross rings - correct and incorrect.
Of course, they (these signatures) occur very rarely and they are unique crosses.
Number 1 is good signatur.
Number 2 is fake sygnatur.
IMO.

Regards
Jarek

[sanya13]

Hí
Thomas here are the "new" pictures

[Thomas E Hansen]

Hí

Thomas here are the "new" pictures

I Think it’s looks ok.

[sanya13]

.

[boch_62]

Maybe I'm wrong but IMO there are the same signature ...for me it's not must be good

Jarek

[sanya13]

hí Jarek

Sorry my friend ,but I can't agree with you on this now

I think ,have some matching the two markings between
(of course this is my opinion )

2.picture
/// the referencia pictures not mine ,but this see on the Stefan Temme side/////

I show what I thinkedI

In my opinion we meet two types of "L/12" signatures on Juncker's EK2-1939 cross rings - correct and incorrect.
Of course, they (these signatures) occur very rarely and they are unique crosses.
Number 1 is good signatur.
Number 2 is fake sygnatur.
IMO.

Regards
Jarek

[sanya13]

IMO have some similar things on the mm

[sanya13]

of course not total same ,because the one mm have straight and the other on a vaulted surface

[boch_62]

Hi Sanya

Rather, let's not support the names - who and what ...

Let's see the pictures ...
I would prefer to compare straight lines, not curvatures (they are not objective).

But as I wrote, I can be wrong.
I had in my hands a cross with one signature (those in my opinion good) and with the other (in my opinion a dubious signature) - the differences are noticeable.

This is where I finish my statements in this topic, unless there are other crosses with the signature "L/12" on the ring

Regards
Jarek