SandeBoetik

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

KVK1 maker?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    KVK1 maker?

    Hi guys,can you tell the maker of this KVK1? Tnx for looking..
    Attached Files

    #2
    Backside
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      Very asymmetric pin. Never seen as I recall.

      Comment


        #4
        I have now got the makermark to show you..Dr Franke & CO
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          The front looks kind of okay but the problems starts on the back.

          Like schönbeck says it's a very asymmetric pin. Okay, could be a replacement but why stamp the pin with L/65, who never made a kvk?!

          I'll leave the conclusion to you

          Comment


            #6
            Well the maker Dr.Franke & CO are on the list of KVK makers..
            He might not be on the list of this forum,but in other forums..
            And if this cross are a fake where are the other crosses on the market?
            Still this is the only one found with this mark...

            Comment


              #7
              Well, it's the first time I've seen L/65 on a KVK, not that it means that much.

              Nothing in my files and no mention in Gordon Williamsons KVK book either but no problem Could be a new maker, who knows?

              Comment


                #8
                Hi Frank, I have sent pics of this VERY RARE & ONLY ONE KNOWN to KVK collectors So in this time I have no doubt about the authencity of this KVK1..
                Chris K

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'd bet it's not original.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by stukapilot View Post
                    I'd bet it's not original.
                    I personal would take this KVK1 at home!
                    I have more than one KVK1 which is not known, Wiedmann, W&L marked L/55 and even L/20 marked KVK1 which is not even on the LDO list!

                    I can only say, we do know not much about KVK1! But the design is from Lüdenscheid-Area and hook and pin combination is not like S&L, even the pin form is known, but maybe too much deformed by the maker mark!

                    I would go for it, if I would find this cross!

                    Wiedmann:
                    http://kvk1-dna.de/ferdinand-wiedman...---pinback.php
                    W&L L/55 - seen two times:
                    http://kvk1-dna.de/l-55-rudolf-waech...---pinback.php
                    L/20:
                    http://kvk1-dna.de/-l-20--unknown-maker---screwback.php

                    So far we know nothing about KVK1 and I would be happy to make Fotos of this KVK1 with Lüdenscheid-Design

                    Nobody will mark a KVK1 with original obverse design with None typical pin/ catch combination with L/65 which is listed as official LDO maker only one time!

                    For me it is an authentic & rare cross ;-) A very hard nut to get!

                    The KVK1 w/o was not so important that even the maker 50 could produced the most of all KVK1 w/o Swords!
                    Last edited by 5tefan; 10-28-2014, 03:42 PM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Hi Stefan this very very RARE KVK1 are on it's way to you for inhand inspection &
                      a photo session...I am looking forward to hear your opinion...

                      Comment


                        #12
                        until proven otherwise I believe it's no good.

                        Is there anything else marked L/65 that we can look at? Right now I don't recall anything similar but I could be wrong ofcourse.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Howdy!
                          This cross is a fake cross.

                          I can not understand why the statement in this thread that this would be a authentic & rare cross has not been corrected.

                          Best regards
                          Martin

                          Comment


                            #14
                            ....as I said :-)

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Sparvhök View Post
                              Howdy!
                              This cross is a fake cross.

                              I can not understand why the statement in this thread that this would be a authentic & rare cross has not been corrected.

                              Best regards
                              Martin
                              Nice work, Martin

                              Well, two members insist that it's a real and rare cross but without solid evidence it's hard to prove them wrong.

                              I also stumbled upon this L/12 in my fake files but the obverse is missing here. The catch, hinge etc looks similar but without the front it's hard to conclude.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X