David Hiorth

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RITTERKREUZ KVK without swords

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    kvk knights cross

    you will find there were other makers of the knights cross if the KVK, you will see 900 1,, 935-4 also some marked 20. check out the reference by williamson and charita.! lets see,,deschler of munich,zimmerman of pforzheim, and steinhauer and luck of ludenscheid

    Comment


      #32
      wow.. a really nice and rare one

      Scott

      Comment


        #33
        Thanks to all guys, I'm proud of this piece and now happy to know it is definitively a rare original one.

        My books:


        - THE WEHRPAß & SOLDBUCH OF THE WH
        - THE SS TK RING
        - THE ITALIAN-GERMAN MEDAL
        - THE ANTI PARTISAN BADGE
        - THE AWARDS OF THE LW

        and more!


        sigpic

        Comment


          #34
          Very nice..
          Ciaooooo

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by stukapilot View Post
            This is a must have sign.
            The two being compared are clearly different, especially in the centre. Are they supposed to be from the same maker?

            Rich
            Interested in hand-stitched EM/NCO LW insignia and cuff-titles
            Decorations of Germany

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Richard Gordon View Post
              The two being compared are clearly different, especially in the centre. Are they supposed to be from the same maker?

              Rich



              Both would appear to be Deschler, Rich. Stukapilots would by the looks be the purported earlier made piece and Antony's the so called later one.



              I compared the pebbling of Stuka's to mine and it's a perfect match. His is also consistent with the traits associated with the earlier cross, in my amateur opinion; incidentally, mine is a late cross. It would perhaps be interesting to know the weight of his example.

              Stuka, also appears to be correct in that the originals do seem to share this ''flaw'' in the corner of the swas too. Although, it is certainly more difficult to observe - to my mind - on the latter produced cross, as with mine it can only be seen really at an oblique view.

              And, as to the whole one or two die and flaw legacy concerning the without swords Deschler examples...???


              Regards,


              Marcus
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #37
                Hi, Marcus

                The weight is 33 g.


                Originally posted by Marcus Hatton View Post
                Both would appear to be Deschler, Rich. Stukapilots would by the looks be the purported earlier made piece and Antony's the so called later one.



                I compared the pebbling of Stuka's to mine and it's a perfect match. His is also consistent with the traits associated with the earlier cross, in my amateur opinion; incidentally, mine is a late cross. It would perhaps be interesting to know the weight of his example.

                Stuka, also appears to be correct in that the originals do seem to share this ''flaw'' in the corner of the swas too. Although, it is certainly more difficult to observe - to my mind - on the latter produced cross, as with mine it can only be seen really at an oblique view.

                And, as to the whole one or two die and flaw legacy concerning the without swords Deschler examples...???


                Regards,


                Marcus

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by stukapilot View Post
                  Hi, Marcus

                  The weight is 33 g.

                  Thank you, Stukapilot, I think then I have posted a rather misleading response above: if I'm not mistaken this weight is more conducive to a ''later'' production piece. Mine, weighs in at 33.6g; hence, deemed one of the late crosses compared to heavier counterparts of the earlier examples.

                  Most odd, as I just can't see the latter traits in yours

                  I think I'd better visit the optician and gain a bit more knowledge on these before posting in the future; I'm sure the more conversed will be able to respond appropriately.


                  Regards,


                  Marcus

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Hi Guys,

                    I have seen another example of Antonio Scapini's type 2 RK KvK at an upcoming auction. I am wondering how scarce these are compared to the type 1 1/900 RK KvKs. Dietrich Maerz has said that he has no problem with these second type 1/900 crosses but has not studied them in depth. Should they be more expensive than the first pattern due to the rarity factor or cheaper due to possibly being later production? All comments welcome,

                    Cheers,
                    Michael


                    Comment


                      #40
                      Michael - I think they look great an make an excellent addition if collecting these pieces - i've not seen many of them come up - great that Dietrich Maerz has no problem with them

                      Comment

                      Users Viewing this Thread

                      Collapse

                      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                      Working...
                      X