RITTERKREUZ KVK without swords

[Antonio Scapini]

As requested better pictures...

[MH184]

Not my forte, but in my opinion also: I think you have an original and very nice conditoned cross, Antony.


Regards,


Marcus

[stukapilot]

As requested better pictures...

Antony, sorry, but that's not enough...
Anyway you can compare!

[Ludwig]

[Antonio Scapini]

Thanks to all guys for your opinions!
Happy you enjoy as I do this cross!

[Flemming]

Antony, sorry, but that's not enough...
Anyway you can compare!

I have tried to make a comparison on the two Swaz here:

/Flemming

[Flemming]

made a new picture, now the swaz should be (almost) the same size.

/Flemming

[hkusp40]

I have tried to make a comparison on the two Swaz here:

/Flemming

Does the background behind the swaz on the right one look pebbled compared to a flat background on the left one? I see very, very small differences between the two, but that may just be wear of time, die wear, etc. I am personally comfortable with either one, but I am no expert in KVK RK's. -Ger

[nostromo]

Fantastic KVK Rt, is in very good condition, congrat!

[stukapilot]

made a new picture, now the swaz should be (almost) the same size.

/Flemming

This is a must have sign.

[Antonio Scapini]

Which is the maker of your RK-KVK? Please can you post yours?

Do you think there is only a type for all the war?

Don't you see there are some other differences between the two crosses?

[magnusmilitaria]

wao very nice! I would like to have one for collection!

[stukapilot]

Which is the maker of your RK-KVK? Please can you post yours?

Do you think there is only a type for all the war?

Don't you see there are some other differences between the two crosses?

Yes I think there was only one type due to the small production. But there can be some differences. My early cross has no "1" - only "900" mark.

[stukapilot]

...

[stukapilot]

some more