Hi guys, have only got previteras combat badge book number 2 as a reference and hasn't all examples, what is the feeling on this?
Thanks in advance.
Tintin
Thanks in advance.
Tintin
-
-
2
2 -
3
3Comment
-
4
4Comment
-
5
5Comment
-
weight
I forgot to mention that the cross weighs 34g. which ties in with the weights in the combat badges vol 2 book.Comment
-
From my references, the cross looks ok, but not the 'CEJ' mark. Also, I can't recall seeing an early gold/silver cross with 'CEJ' not accompanied by '800' or '900'.
I'd be curious to hear what others say about this one too.Comment
-
In the photo in post 4, there seems to be some pock marks ?
/flemmingComment
-
my feeling is that this one is a forgery in high degree. its silver finishs tell me, as well as the CEJ marks.
Maybe I am wrong, we'll the expertise.....Last edited by DKig; 09-09-2010, 01:13 AM.Comment
-
I don't like it, ....maker mark doesn't look right, here is picture of real CEJ maker mark next to the one in question.
....and SC looks kind of new - like it was made yesterday.Comment
-
8
Those aren't pock marks, just stains or dirt?Originally posted by Flemming View Post
Any more opinions would be appreciated?
I read a 6 year old thread on this forum referring to CEJ maker marks without a silver content mark? Has there been no further developments on this, as these awards were also manufactured in silvered tombac post the original silver presentation pieces? ( which did have the silver content mark).
Thanks,
TintinComment
-
Tintin, I recommend you PM members Sal Williams and Jacques to have them look at it - they're fairly experienced with Spanish Crosses. Can you post the link to the thread discussing gold/silver CEJ crosses without silver marks?
Thanks.Comment
-
Here is mine just in from Winkler, I hope this one is good atleast, even though it has same kind of cej,Comment
-
...Comment
-
10
Hi guys any more opinions would be appreciated?
Many Thanks,
Tintin.Comment
Comment