Hello gentlemen,
<O></O>
As some of you are aware that I recently acquired a Cased Spanish Cross in Silver with swords marked CEJ. The piece was less than textbook, i.e. the maker mark was not on the mark as well as the pebbling in second exterior circle surrounding the Swaz.. However, I felt the example to original based on the construction method and design and just the feel for the piece. Added to that the lack of examples available for research that were produced by Juncker as well as marked CEJ, but were an alloy basesd medal not silver, but rather a nickel silver with a silver plating or buntmetal with a silver-plating with the CEJ maker mark. My research included reference books, inquiries of the better-known dealers to us on the forum as well as a few members well versed in the award. This is not a conclusive statement, but rather a sharing of information.
<O></O>
JD
<O></O>
As some of you are aware that I recently acquired a Cased Spanish Cross in Silver with swords marked CEJ. The piece was less than textbook, i.e. the maker mark was not on the mark as well as the pebbling in second exterior circle surrounding the Swaz.. However, I felt the example to original based on the construction method and design and just the feel for the piece. Added to that the lack of examples available for research that were produced by Juncker as well as marked CEJ, but were an alloy basesd medal not silver, but rather a nickel silver with a silver plating or buntmetal with a silver-plating with the CEJ maker mark. My research included reference books, inquiries of the better-known dealers to us on the forum as well as a few members well versed in the award. This is not a conclusive statement, but rather a sharing of information.
<O></O>
JD
Comment