Also if L/15 WAS Laurer and they purchased Schickles items/equipment, and then marked them with L/15 couldnt that explain why earlier collectors decided L/15 was Schickle?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Schickle really L/15 ??
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sal Williams View PostOh and the L/15 "poem" , what is that? Also is it true that it can be interpreted in both the totally different ways as was stated? Both equally plausible in German?
I do not subscribe to either interpretation - both make no sense at all IMHO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brian S View PostSome misinformation in this thread that I have not found corrected...
The pictures in these catalog pages are NOT drawings they are photos.
This was a process to create the catalog from original photos, not drawings.
That's why these pages are significant.
Comment
-
Brian is absolute correct ...
the Schickle catalog is based on photos from the original awards but as always many people wouldn't believe that because than they had to accept that many L/15 marked awards doesn't match the photo in the catalog (look at the clasp to the IC 1st class i showed).Last edited by ak72; 08-25-2008, 04:10 AM.Best regards, Andreas
______
The Wound Badge of 1939
www.vwa1939.com
The Iron Cross of 1939- out now!!! Place your orders at:
www.ek1939.com
Comment
-
Guys, there are two observations I've made whilst reading through Gordon's threads about manufacturer's catalogues on the GMIC.
1. In the Steinhauer&Luck catalogue, the LDO-number is L16, which further confirms what has been said here before i.e. the question of dash or not shouldn't perhaps be that important.
2. I also belive we should further examine the pages from the two catalogues 1938 and 1940, to find out if the reference to their page-numbers is correct. Take a look at the alleged p.20 from the 1938 catalogue and it will be crystal clear
cheers
Peter
Comment
-
A strange oddity of the catalogue/supplement is the U-Boat badges, I had a 16mm mini, it had the space below the sub solid, as in the Schickle 1940 catalogue, but in the supplement the 16mm mini is the type cut out below the sub, so that does'nt figure.
Also the full size award.. Gordon has great knowledge of that badge, and he would have looked at those images real good, surely he would have noticed if the badge in the catalogue did not match the full size one in the supplement, he had a better view than us just looking at low res scans.
C
Comment
-
BTW when we speak of "Gordon" are we talking about G. Williamson or Richard G.?
I was thinking about this and it doesn't seems so complex if a few things are true.
If there are badges that match up to the Schickle catalog and are marked L/15 it would make sense that one would assume these to be Schickle. But If there is no written evidence giving the L/15 number to Schickle one still wouldn't have reason to question it. Given written evidence (it would be nice to know what publication this was in) of L/15 being given to laurer, why is it so hard to believe that Lauerer bought Shickle badges when they went out of business and marked them L/15? Am I missing something?
Best, Sal
Comment
-
I was talking about Gordon Williamson, he knows the U-Boat badges really well and the different makers/types. The U-Boat badge is shown in both the supplement and the main 1940 catalogue, I was making the point that I think he would have noticed if they were different badges surely. he knows the IC's pretty well too.
C
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 4 users online. 0 members and 4 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment