S&L 935/4

[George Stimson]

Can't you post those pics in "Association" or something, Dave? This is supposed to be a discussion Forum related to Iron Crosses and such.

[Dave Kane]

Of course....but I related a bit of confusion because of the stress of the fire! Just like your rabbits were used as a 'tool'!

Just give me the word George! I'd be glad to adhere to selective posting

[George Stimson]

It's fine to use one "off topic" pic to make a point (like the single picture of the buns was), but if you want to do a series on another topic do it in Association or someplace. (In fact, a thread on the fire might be interesting! )

[Sal Williams]

.

[Dietrich Maerz]

.

[Dietrich Maerz]

Dietrich will you post the 'font' side by side and if possible an early vs. late dent row?

I don't see any benefit in posting the fonts side by side instead of top to bottom which I have already done. The fonts are the same.
(Top to bottom for the reason of better use of available area - by the way)

Now here is a (top to bottom) comparison between a (yes, yours...) "935-4" (bottom) and a "935". The 935 dent row is fairly pristine and measured with my 57 cross very, very pristine. All dents are there and well defined.

[Dave Kane]

Dietrich, is the '935' the Cross Harry had for a little while?

[Dietrich Maerz]

I don't know, you should - I got the pictures from you!

[Dave Kane]

Now I'm further confused....this is from your post#83. It's the same Cross, yes? What are you getting at?

[Thomas H]

Hi all,

Maybe I missed it, but is the loop marked '800' or '935' ?

Dave can you check you 935/4 loop and is it marked '800' or '935' ?

Greetings, Thomas

ps. Is the cross in question the same cross Weitze sold two weeks ago?

[Dietrich Maerz]

Dave,

got these pictures from you as a 935 . The dent row is for sure from a different cross - but from the same bunch of pictures from you!

Dietrich

[Dave Kane]

I think you may have mixed up couple of pics The only 935 Crosses that I've seen are from dealer sites and Harry's. I could never have shot pics as close as those!


The '935' (only) for sure shows a different font to that of the 4 marked Cross...

[Dave Kane]

Thomas, mine is 800 marked! And, with the typical conical tip.

[Dietrich Maerz]

Okay, so we should not use those for a comparison.

I just want to add that I got those pictures from you on 8/19/2004. Maybe the mix up is that I thought it to be a 935 and you meant 935-4.

However, the dent row is not from your cross since they are obviously different but we do not know now whether this is from a 935 or a 935-4. It was however part of the same bunch of pictures from you.

So back to the topic:

"The '935' (only) for sure shows a different font to that of the 4 marked Cross..."

This should be easy to proofe if it 'for sure'! Please do it. It might be important.

Dietrich

[Dave Kane]

This one is different!