Ok I rarely comment on uniform items, but 2 comments here:
1. I have been collecting for 35 years and I am still not at the point where I can or would make a statement like "officers' private purchase items were idiosyncratic" etc. etc.. There were strict regulations and these were followed to the letter in the pre 1914 army-especially for anybody below the rank of Major. In some cavalry regiments (notibly Hussars!) where 'tone" counted for more than capacity, officers were cashiered for having lace 5mm too wide and for not having polished boots on parade!
I suspect that this may be a "heritage day busby" made up in the 1940s (or later) as on Regiment Days some members of the regiment took it upon themselves to wear historical uniforms from the past. These concocted uniforms were usually made up lwith ersatz materials like this. I suspect the skull was added later for added value by a dealer.
Either that or it is a totally concocted fake, which given the value these things command, is rather leikely.
1. I have been collecting for 35 years and I am still not at the point where I can or would make a statement like "officers' private purchase items were idiosyncratic" etc. etc.. There were strict regulations and these were followed to the letter in the pre 1914 army-especially for anybody below the rank of Major. In some cavalry regiments (notibly Hussars!) where 'tone" counted for more than capacity, officers were cashiered for having lace 5mm too wide and for not having polished boots on parade!
I suspect that this may be a "heritage day busby" made up in the 1940s (or later) as on Regiment Days some members of the regiment took it upon themselves to wear historical uniforms from the past. These concocted uniforms were usually made up lwith ersatz materials like this. I suspect the skull was added later for added value by a dealer.
Either that or it is a totally concocted fake, which given the value these things command, is rather leikely.
Comment