What's This Picture About?
Oberscharfuhrer, assigned to/had served in, the LAH holding an interim baton.
Charles Betz
Oberscharfuhrer, assigned to/had served in, the LAH holding an interim baton.
Charles Betz
-
Last edited by C. Betz; 12-27-2017, 12:33 AM. -
Re
Why not talk about the fake camo smocks pictured here as originals for comparison with a pink smock-again look into ww2 german clothing documentiation before you say something is real or not. The documentation textbook for the tarnjacke sheds few details on the "originals" .Originally posted by C. Betz View Post
Probably someone has this picured the panzerkombinatzion and tarnjacke ww2 drawings that are on same page.
It is the upper set of eyelets which based on ww2 documentation should be on the upper edge of the material. You have 3 types of smocks.
Type I, Type I with elastic and lower positioned pocket access, and type type II. On all of these the upper set of lace eyelets is at the edge of the material.
In these photos posted here only the Palm smock has the textbook positioning.Last edited by mo-do; 12-27-2017, 06:55 AM.Comment
-
Re
Charles Betz[/QUOTE]
Why not talk about the fake camo smocks pictured here as originals for comparison with a pink smock-again look into ww2 german clothing documentiation before you say something is real or not. The documentation textbook for the tarnjacke sheds few details on the "originals" .
Probably someone has this ww2 picture the panzerkombinatzion and tarnjacke ww2 drawings that are on same page of that documentation.
It is the upper set of eyelets which based on ww2 documentation should be on the upper edge of the material. You have 3 types of smocks.
Type I, Type I with elastic at the opening, and lower positioned pocket access, and type type II with hbt pockets.
The repros positioning of these eyelets is different.
1) On all of original smocks type I, type II, the upper set of lace eyelets is at the edge of the material -all the repros have that set of eyelets lowered by about 1/2 inch.
In the photos posted here by kammoman only the Palm smock has the textbook positioning of the eyelets.
Can you find ww2 photos that prove ?
2)All of the type II smocks with hbt pockets should have folded (sewn edge of the cuff)
3)All type I smocks should have unfolded cuff or woven edge of fabric.Comment
-
Enzyme Overload
Why did you attribute this rant to me:"Charles Betz[/QUOTE] Why not talk about the fake camo smocks pictured here as originals for comparison with a pink smock-again look into ww2 german clothing documentiation before you say something is real or not. The documentation textbook for the tarnjacke sheds few details on the "originals" .
Probably someone has this picured the panzerkombinatzion and tarnjacke ww2 drawings that are on same page.
It is the upper set of eyelets which based on ww2 documentation should be on the upper edge of the material. You have 3 types of smocks.
Type I, Type I with elastic and lower positioned pocket access, and type type II. On all of these the upper set of lace eyelets is at the edge of the material.
In these photos posted here only the Palm smock has the textbook positioning."
It seems the thread has gone from batons to smocks. Time to put this puppy to bed.
Charles BetzLast edited by C. Betz; 12-27-2017, 07:27 AM.Comment
-
Re
Why not talk about the fake camo smocks pictured here as originals for comparison with a pink smock-again look into ww2 german clothing documentiation before you say something is real or not. The documentation textbook for the tarnjacke sheds few details on the "originals" .Originally posted by C. Betz View Post
Probably someone has this picured the panzerkombinatzion and tarnjacke ww2 drawings that are on same page.
It is the upper set of eyelets which based on ww2 documentation should be on the upper edge of the material. You have 3 types of smocks.
Type I, Type I with elastic and lower positioned pocket access, and type type II. On all of these the upper set of lace eyelets is at the edge of the material.
In these photos posted here only the Palm smock has the textbook positioning."
It seems the thread has gone from batons to smocks. Time to put this puppy to bed.
Charles Betz[/QUOTE]
Good night.Comment
-
I was watching this to find out if it ever existed, but now it people rambling about nothing!!Comment
-
If this was posting was on the WRF forum it would have been “ blasted out of the water instantly”
This is making a mockery of this fine forum
Comment
-
Baton
Hey, come over here Kid....I got a nice SS Marshalls Baton to sell you.Comment
-
Stop with the eyelet positioning nonsense. You have already been shown a picture by Robert debunking your theory based on some drawings. If you have anything useful to add post it but I don't want to see another post about the eyelets as you have already been proven wrong on this matter.Originally posted by mo-do View PostLooking for a 30 '06 Chauchat magazine.Comment
-
Re
This thread does not pertain to camo smocks and as you stated :Originally posted by Jeff V View Post
"The goal is not censorship but preservation of thread integrity".
So why mix 2 threads???Comment
-
Good question, why don't you answer your own question? You keep posting about smocks in a baton thread.Originally posted by mo-do View PostLooking for a 30 '06 Chauchat magazine.Comment
-
Re
I havent been proven wrong in regards to the smocks lack of conformity to any texled documentation, these "line drawings"are ww2 era and I bet that 90% of original smocks conformed to these drawings . Both the pink smocks, brick, and the ones made with chainstiching machinery are fantasy . Pointless to say more. The HBT tunic found in soviet museum could be real regardless if it has soviet stamps or not.Originally posted by Jeff V View PostComment
Comment