I saw this online a few weeks ago and just wanted to ask if it makes it a SS M44 tunic with it having no seam on reverse and the typical silk herringbone lining found in many SS M43 tunics. I know the rear seam question has no definative answer but i wondered if it made it more probable with the lining ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SS M44 ? no back seam herringbone lining
Collapse
X
-
GuestTags: None
-
I have owned Heer m44 tunics with and without rear seam. I would imagine the same for SS. I would not rule out an SS tunic being original just based on that. I would assume that both seamed and seamless would have been made for the ss as well, though I do not have any proof of that. That said m44 tunics are easy to make ss, especially unissued ones.
-
Guest
More pictures
Comment
-
Guest
Comment
-
Guest
One additional thing i noticed ; no belt supporter holes or adjustment parts in sleeve. Could this be " last ditch production " or Repro ??
Comment
-
Originally posted by waffen44 View PostOne additional thing i noticed ; no belt supporter holes or adjustment parts in sleeve. Could this be " last ditch production " or Repro ??
KevinLast edited by WEISNER; 03-07-2014, 02:11 PM.
Comment
-
Guest
Kevin . Thanks for your kind information. I figured the " green patchwork" repairs and lack of pocket flaps would be consummate to a POW usage possibly.
Comment
-
Right Robert, nothing to worry about. IMO most M44's but not all were made without a back seam. many of the earlier fakes had a back seam, so seeing a seam gives me cause for pause when inspecting one.
I remember a while back that Glenn posted a very nice M44 with a back seam from his hoard, I also seem to remember seeing a period photo here on the forum showing one with a seam.
so having a back seam is not the kiss of death, just a rare thing to see IMO on period M44's.
Kev
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment