Announcement

**Ian Hulley** · 03-22-2011, 05:33 PM

May I please point out that in these images the proportions of the relic tunic don't match the photographs.

Only my honest opinion.

Ian

**RobertE** · 03-22-2011, 06:55 PM

Nice looking tunic and photograph. Besides being an army-style tunic, which plenty of SS tunics were, the area under the eagle looks very worn. It should be fuzzy under the eagle where it was protected.

If the eagle was removed post war to denazify it, the incriminating outline of the SS eagle would have also likely have been picked out, IMO. Leaving the outline of an SS arm eagle and wearing it to the point the nap was worn away seems odd - but possible, I suppose.

I'd look closely at the right breast and collar area before adding this to my collection as an SS piece.

Either way, it is certainly a nice worn tunic in it's own right.

regards, Robert

**wisches** · 03-23-2011, 09:56 AM

Originally posted by RobertE View Post

Nice looking tunic and photograph. Besides being an army-style tunic, which plenty of SS tunics were, the area under the eagle looks very worn. It should be fuzzy under the eagle where it was protected.

If the eagle was removed post war to denazify it, the incriminating outline of the SS eagle would have also likely have been picked out, IMO. Leaving the outline of an SS arm eagle and wearing it to the point the nap was worn away seems odd - but possible, I suppose.

I'd look closely at the right breast and collar area before adding this to my collection as an SS piece.

Either way, it is certainly a nice worn tunic in it's own right.

regards, Robert

Robert,
i would agree, i'd be happier to see cloth under eagle less worn under where eagle on the arm was!!!
pay attention to breast area above pocket.....
a real tunic, not so sure if ss,
sorry,
wisches

**Ian Hulley** · 03-23-2011, 10:15 AM

No sign of either a cufftitle or chevron shadow either ? As I said last night the tunic doesn't match the photographs in my honest opinion ... look at the distance between the collar and the top pocket ... it appears to be a much bigger tunic.

Ian

**RobertE** · 03-23-2011, 10:20 AM

Ian is right IMO about this not being the same tunic, though it certainly could have belonged to the soldier in the photos as they certainly had more than one tunic.

Good comment on the cufftitle - if traces of the sleeve eagle are present, should be the same for the cufftitle especially for this division and model of tunic. He could have been promoted later which the chevron worn on a later tunic, but the cufftitle...

s/f Robert

**Glenn McInnes** · 03-23-2011, 10:25 AM

Someone just added an arm eagle and removed it,probably to make it more desirable and saleable since it is just a relic Heer pattern tunic.IMO

Also appears that the replaced buttons are also sewn with the same (new) black thread as the eagle.

Glenn

**odin007** · 03-23-2011, 11:09 AM

Thanks for the all reply to my post.
There are no collector in this german familly but i understand your opinion
Best regards

**Daniel.S** · 03-24-2011, 07:38 AM

And now on Estand.

Odin, buy the item, not the story.

**Kurt Meyer** · 03-24-2011, 08:44 AM

M40 tunic?

**odin007** · 03-24-2011, 01:30 PM

The 2 pictures were send with the jakcet by the familly.
That is the story !!

**odin007** · 03-24-2011, 01:57 PM

and in final sold.

Announcement

SS tunic of a LSSAH

SS tunic of a LSSAH

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Users Viewing this Thread