I agree with Winkelman that the detailing seems a bit rough. could it be a copy?
If we're talking about the maker 475/39, as far as I understand, both experienced collectors had different points in the past.
Chris felt that it was a good one, while Brad felt that it wasnt. so this piece again will be a debate.
Two types of this marker that i have seen:
I am not a fan , I do not believe this is a good one but it's up to the buyer. My view has not changed old known fakes are now being accepted because they are old. Why waste your money on an item that will be accepted by some and rejected by others, buy Cupal and sleep easy
I must admit that the " Wagner-family " has lost much credit due to the zinc 475/42 & 475/43 repro's that took a lot of people by surprise some 20 years ago - including me .
I kept this 475/43 ( never existed ) - notice that the detail may be even better than on some of the zinc originals . Fortunately the pins were all bad - in hindsight ..
Comment