Black tunic

[Mike TM]

Hello, insignia sure crap. the tunic itself has any chance?

Thanks
Mike

[Mike TM]

shoulder board

[Mike TM]

cufftitle

[Mike TM]

.

[bonneville]

s

In my opinion,is a very bad tunic,bad material maybe the Hong Kong production? Also is a sintetic material from this pictures.

[Ian Hulley]

As bonneville say's .. bad material and bad tunic.

Ian.

[colt45s]

french cuff and title were fooled with

[Antiquefrog]

Mike -

Any marks or stamps inside, on the buttons, under the board? Anything?

[Antiquefrog]

Here's an EM for comparison:

[Wilibald]

I sell some repro tunics, and I would really like to see the inside of the breast pockets on this dienstrock: look for interfacing I REALLY suspect this an Hong-Kong made dientsrock (probably a 2008 production). Can I see the "dagger hanger" details?

As for the fabric itself, there is nothing wrong with trikot (gabardine) for officers. The twill is allright, but I need to see the koppelhaken (the belt ramp-buttons) at the back. I've provided the originals major Asian makers are now using to make their repro: they were so stupid that they eliminated the pebble grain and they judged it was "not necessary" to copy the SS/RZM markings under the buttons because "most of it is covered by fabric when installed" *sigh*

One Italian crook bought a few gabardine tunics from me last year (or maybe 2 years ago) and he aged it beyond any "reasonable" level to pass it as 7000Euros originals... he even removed the interfacing inside of the pockets... but it left traces. I now put a few hidden ink stamps on the faux-silk liner to avoid such thefts, That guy is still in business and people with no real knowledge are still falling for his stuff...

Cheers,


Michel