Hi Grant,
Apreciate your point on Jason and frankly, if either he or you were selling a piece, I would look at it in a completely different light than some anonomous offering on the net. This being said, you are making my point about that leap of faith or trust (which is built on a bunch of intangibles which include provenance and vendor) - in the vast majority of cases, you have no guarentee and your decision is based on informed judgement and (dare I say it) gut feel.
I also do not subscribe to the theory that inevitably the perfect fake will put us all out of business. If nothing else, I can document when I acquired my pieces - which hopefully predates the creation of the perfect fake. Again - if I can trace an item back to 1950, I look at it differently than something that has just surfaced - recognizing that between 1945-1950 this piece could have been a compilation of real tunic and insignia whipped up by the local German tailor for an occupation GI.
John.
Good to hear from and delighted that you are keeping your hand in. I have one or two treasures (none related to any collecting field) that are much like your Kachina. Funny thing (but I think it makes my point about faith, experience and gut), I would probably sell the tunic/grouping that has what I think is rock -solid provenance before another tunic that has no provenance, has never been published and which came from a dealer - but which I utterly believe is a superb combat piece. Now could I sell this for serious dollars without this provenance? I think yes - but frankly it doesn't matter...it speaks to me. And yes I have paid more than 10K for unattributed pieces.
Cheers,
Mike
Apreciate your point on Jason and frankly, if either he or you were selling a piece, I would look at it in a completely different light than some anonomous offering on the net. This being said, you are making my point about that leap of faith or trust (which is built on a bunch of intangibles which include provenance and vendor) - in the vast majority of cases, you have no guarentee and your decision is based on informed judgement and (dare I say it) gut feel.
I also do not subscribe to the theory that inevitably the perfect fake will put us all out of business. If nothing else, I can document when I acquired my pieces - which hopefully predates the creation of the perfect fake. Again - if I can trace an item back to 1950, I look at it differently than something that has just surfaced - recognizing that between 1945-1950 this piece could have been a compilation of real tunic and insignia whipped up by the local German tailor for an occupation GI.
John.
Good to hear from and delighted that you are keeping your hand in. I have one or two treasures (none related to any collecting field) that are much like your Kachina. Funny thing (but I think it makes my point about faith, experience and gut), I would probably sell the tunic/grouping that has what I think is rock -solid provenance before another tunic that has no provenance, has never been published and which came from a dealer - but which I utterly believe is a superb combat piece. Now could I sell this for serious dollars without this provenance? I think yes - but frankly it doesn't matter...it speaks to me. And yes I have paid more than 10K for unattributed pieces.
Cheers,
Mike
Comment