Why the missing metal on this wing?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
M1/167 zinc eagle
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by SScollector View PostThese flaws are not uncommon. It has the nickel finish and is absolutely original.
Best, Chris
Comment
-
ss
So far i would like to thank you guys for contributing to this thread , i would say this eagle is cast,not die sTruck , i have been ceramic shell casting metals for about 10 years as one of my hobbies and i can tell when metal does not flow into a mold , this wing looks as though it is exactly the case , also look on top of tHe wing face and you can see some wrinkling in the material , this can result from a mould that is not hot enough to accept the melted metal as it is poured into the mould or the melting temp of the metal is not hot enough as iT is poured into the mould ,resulting in cold spots on certain areas of the casting. I do not see any spru marks ,but they could be under the prong mounts , ,,with this said it does not mean the eagle is a reproduced fake , the germanS may have employed this method of manurfacTur instead of a die stRike .now i have seen 4 of these on the forum that are all as in good of condition as this one , so it is suspect to me. One of them even has the exact same lack of metal in the same wing. So? Were some of these found and turned ou into the market or are they now being reproduced , i respect the comments and opinions of all members on this forum and i am just trying to learn , one last thingit cannot be bent with snapping one of the wings there is no give what so ever , that also tells me this is a cast eagle and not die struck.
Comment
-
Eagle
THE USE OF A CENTRIFUGE was the prefered method then and now FOR LOW MELTING TEMP ALLOYS SUCH AS ZINC,ALSO why is there no natural patina with this eagle if it is a nickel finish? And why are all of these that are showing up on the market without a patina as well , this eagle in hand looks as though it is straight zinc , also can anyone tell me what the proper width and hight of this eagle should be ?i am just not convinced yet that these eagles that are showing up are good with this great condition and no patina to the nickle finnish ,we cannot exclude the possiblitiy that these are recently being reproduced. There is a way i might be able to be persuaded. Dimensions will tell the truth , if thay are being copied then there will be a 5% shrink rate from using a new rubber mould from an original 167 3 prong eagle , this will not be too obvious until proper dimensions of an original eagle can be compared to this one and the others just like it.this will be good evidence either way. I will be very happy to be proven wrong, but if it is a bad eagle we should all know .
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment