Somehow no one has turned up the fabled and mythical "original" CR SS helmet. At this point comparing one CR to another is like comparing a fake to a fake. Of course they check out with one another using XRF, because they are the same pile of spray painted fantasy art.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SS Champagne in the Tropics
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Marc Shaffer View PostWithout good close ups, it is hard to say. But I would agree with Jeff V. The one pic of the decal certainly looks like the rune on the left side has overspray typical of the champaign rune decal where the stencil didn't fit close to the helmet's shell.
Open for discussion of course
Comment
-
Originally posted by maui View PostI understand Marc...i don't believe this decal is paint however and has an elemental profile not indicative of paint..
Open for discussion of course
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jean-Loup View PostWho was responsible for analysing the elements in the decal? Is there some sort of report? Is there any evidence if them being reputable? Are there photos of the procedure being done?
JL
Comment
-
Hi,
Originally posted by maui View Posti don't believe this decal is paint however and has an elemental profile not indicative of paint..
Open for discussion of course
If not, then this is like trolling the topic to discuss the sex of angels...
Also the fact that you missed the whole "Champagne rune debunking" is just unbelievable... Even more you confirm that your are a "believer" (check your reply). How can you be sure of what do you "believe" if you don't have the helmet anymore, and you can't post better pics to prove your point ?
To date, Kelly Hicks the official PR guy of the "Champagne rune scam/XRF" NEVER gave ANY proof that a real "Champagne rune decal" exists.
Not a single proof, despite it could be easy to do so.
This is ridiculous at best, and a confirmation of the scam at worse.
See You
Vince
Comment
-
Originally posted by FrenchVolunteer View PostHi,
Can you post better pictures of the decal, please ?
If not, then this is like trolling the topic to discuss the sex of angels...
Also the fact that you missed the whole "Champagne rune debunking" is just unbelievable... Even more you confirm that your are a "believer" (check your reply). How can you be sure of what do you "believe" if you don't have the helmet anymore, and you can't post better pics to prove your point ?
To date, Kelly Hicks the official PR guy of the "Champagne rune scam/XRF" NEVER gave ANY proof that a real "Champagne rune decal" exists.
Not a single proof, despite it could be easy to do so.
This is ridiculous at best, and a confirmation of the scam at worse.
See You
Vince
Comment
-
I am a SS decal novice, but I understand natural vs. contrived wear on most objects. Don't these two CRs appear to have exactly the same pattern of contrived wear? Despite that one is on rough paint and the other on early M35 paint? To me it appears that the same hand did the wear on both. As well as being the same pattern of runes.
I didn't add the arrows; they were on the image already.Willi
Preußens Gloria!
sigpic
Sapere aude
Comment
-
From the pictures provided the edges of the runes in places are not as defined as an original SS decal and this could be caused by the template being slightly off the helmet surface.(especially on the course finish of a M40 or M42) It also has the classic
CR scratch that starts outside the decal area and finishes inside the decal, they always seem to have one of them. I used to look at CR rune helmets in SS steel and think gee the wear on that decal almost looks intentional. I also thought that no two CR runes graphically looked identical, now we know why.
I would be extremely interested on the story of this one being found in a French barn, maybe it was after spending some time first in the U.S.
All in my opinion of course,
Regards,
Bill
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willi Z. View PostI am a SS decal novice, but I understand natural vs. contrived wear on most objects. Don't these two CRs appear to have exactly the same pattern of contrived wear? Despite that one is on rough paint and the other on early M35 paint? To me it appears that the same hand did the wear on both. As well as being the same pattern of runes.
I didn't add the arrows; they were on the image already.
Notice how different the composition looks. This picture speaks a thousand words IMHO. Totally different, you can see...Flat .....blah
its not about graphics , its about composition , unless the faker loaded up his paint with copper and other elements. These are different totally different.
I saw some of the best fake SS Pochers that came out of France, graphically perfect, but totally off of real SS Pochers...again composition. a real SS pocher has xx elements , fakes have typically x
Maybe this is fake , who knows. I have been fooled before
all I know is I humbly built a nice little collection and happy with it
but I was fortunate to analyze some of the greatest german helmet collections in the world .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willi Z. View PostDavid, to me it is so blatantly obvious, and that was even while using a iPhone with no magnification. Honestly, I am not surprised you would disagree. There is nothing more I can say here....
Willi, the lower left rune is not even close as a comparison ??/
Comment
-
Originally posted by maui View PostWilli, the lower left rune is not even close as a comparison ??/
I am simply telling you what I know.. BTW... do you want to know the secret element pervasive in most all original helmets...
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment