I don't like the cuff button holes either. The tunic too strange for me to be comfortable with it. Enough said. Steve
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Opinions on this M40 tunic needed
Collapse
X
-
I think its a bad one as well - reason - corners of the pockets even the pics are quite misleading, the corners of the pocket always tell the truth IMO
Originally posted by Buckliger View PostAre you serious with that much chatting about that tunic. it is a artifacial agedfake wich I wouldn t take for free . just look at th buttonholes, needs no more to say.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NickG View PostMaterials do look period based on this set of images....
the longer I look the pictures, the clearer the honest sandpaperwork comes out.Last edited by Buckliger; 02-27-2015, 01:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Buckliger View Postnothing is period. it is a well aged sturm copy. sleeve cuffs have still or again repro buttons applied. Small belt hook holes tell it s own story....I would bet the wool is 30% plastic mix...
the longer I look the pictures, the clearer the honest sandpaperwork comes out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Soldat de Fer View PostI agree, button holes seem to be at the wrong place and too small compared to original ( size typical of sturm) lining artificially aged as well, material under the collar aslo and were the markings used to be, nothing natural about the ageing . Made to fool obviously and someone will get burned by it ( or already has )
Who know his website address?
Thanks
Daniele
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment