I do not think those markings look good. and 113...and the materials used are suspect
I agree with both points.
I could also add that I don't like the stamps (font nor placement) in general. If the chest size was 112 or 114 ( I question if odd chest size stamps were ever used??) it would be like a US 46 or 48 inch chest......so it would be interesting to see if it is in fact that large.
In my humble opinion you can not judge a tunic by stamps, Bob I would like to see this wrap before say you is bad, by the way I never seen the stamp 113.
I don't like the collar tabs or shoulder board ciphers. The cuff title looks good and the shoulder board, sans ciphers, are good. I don't see the reinforcement stitches where the collar meets the body, in the front. This is present on all my other wrappers. The breast eagle is the flatwire type machine sewn when tunic was made. It is WHEN the tunic was made that concerns me.
Bob hritz
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
Duct tape can't fix stupid, but it can muffle the sound.
Comment