luxembourgh left behind M44 feldbluse

[Johnny R]

Yes..How did you know?..


Glenn

I read your book. . .

[shinerb]

I was going to comment about adding the sleeve insignia but no need.

[besslein]

looks bad to me as well

[Luca Ongaro]

looks bad to me as well

Indeed.
Luca

[foy1944]

m44 tunic

hi folks ,i respect your comments and understand your doubts ,but it realy came from diekirch in the '60s .
i am afraid this is beginning to be an endless discution abouth this and that... so lets call it a day and move on .
thank you for al the honnest opinions you gave .
greetings ,jo.

[Gran Sasso]

hi folks ,i respect your comments and understand your doubts ,but it realy came from diekirch in the '60s .

Did you have picked it up yourself? - No, and therefore there is no proof of the story, no matter how close you are to the previus owner.

He could just have told you a story, or he got indeed once a M44 out of a farm, but traded it for this one, or or or. To many options we can think of.

Like always, buy the item, not the story.

[frits00]

Different style, different markings, different opinions, always. Imo

[Johnny R]

IMO The tunic is an unquestionable reproduction, nothing is period about it, the boards look to be fake as well. The lining material is a type of clth used in many copies from that time. I would guess it is at most 25 years old probably more like 10.

One needs to be careful buying and selling livestock. It can get dangerous especially with experienced cow dealers.

[panzer_erc]

.....
Like always, buy the item, not the story.

Yes, I agree!

[Christian_GJR3]

...

I also think that it is a repro jacket faked. The photos could be better though. Too much flash, to much blur.

[m.alex]

.

Not original