Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Luft Felddivision NCO collar tabs real?
Collapse
X
-
Dear Ramjet,
I have never seen an overcoat tab for FD, but that being said, I like the construction of the tabs, especially the reverse. I have never seen a reproduction tab with the flaps of badge cloth sewn down like they are on this one. For me the sew down is always a good sign.
As for the backing material I have no problems with the material used here. Backing material varies widely and I have seen cardboard, scraps of cloth or even sheet metal used for the backing material. The material used on yours does not look like any I have seen on repro tabs.
Lastly (I dont have my references here), these are Overcoat tabs since the tress is sewn on the tab material. The tress is, I believe, non standard. There was a regulation which prohibited the use of these overcoat tabs, but I can not remember the date of it. That will be important since FD tabs had a very short lifespan and you would want these tabs to fit into the regs, for example if the regs prohibited the wear of overcoat tabs in mid 42 and FD tabs were only made in 43-44 that could be something to consider. FD tabs were instituted in '43 but I dont recall when the regs changed to prohibit the overcoat tabs. I thkn the reg which prohibited the overcoat tabs was in 43 or 44, I will try to check.
Hope this helps.
Gary BAttached FilesANA LM #1201868, OMSA LM #60, OVMS LM #8348
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gary B View PostDear Ramjet,
I have never seen an overcoat tab for FD, but that being said, I like the construction of the tabs, especially the reverse. I have never seen a reproduction tab with the flaps of badge cloth sewn down like they are on this one. For me the sew down is always a good sign.
As for the backing material I have no problems with the material used here. Backing material varies widely and I have seen cardboard, scraps of cloth or even sheet metal used for the backing material. The material used on yours does not look like any I have seen on repro tabs.
Lastly (I dont have my references here), these are Overcoat tabs since the tress is sewn on the tab material. The tress is, I believe, non standard. There was a regulation which prohibited the use of these overcoat tabs, but I can not remember the date of it. That will be important since FD tabs had a very short lifespan and you would want these tabs to fit into the regs, for example if the regs prohibited the wear of overcoat tabs in mid 42 and FD tabs were only made in 43-44 that could be something to consider. FD tabs were instituted in '43 but I dont recall when the regs changed to prohibit the overcoat tabs. I thkn the reg which prohibited the overcoat tabs was in 43 or 44, I will try to check.
Hope this helps.
Gary B
I think Gary has nailed it. I'm pretty darn sure that the wear of tabs on overcoats ceased even before the formation of the field divisions in late 1942. I'd be very suspect.
Comment
-
The LW stopped putting tabs on their overcoats on 29May1942. They were ordered removed from overcoats(except Guard Reg Berlin and Fuhrer Flak Battalion) by 01Oct42.
However, with that being said, I do like the construction of these tabs. If it were not for the orders stated above, I would have no problem accepting these insignia as good, based upon the photos.
Out of regs, yes. Within the realm of possiblity, yes as well. I would definitely want to look at these tabs in had prior to making a firm decision, but I really like what I see.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment