WW2Treasures

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

K98 Bayonet for Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    K98 Bayonet for Review

    Hi to all,

    I pick up this k98 bayonet which is in excellant condition. Its scabbard is maker marked "Coppel G.m.b.H. 1939" with the serial number 3786i. The tip of the scabbard is stamped with WaA25? The bayonet blade is also stamped with the serial number 3786i. There is no maker mark or Waffenamts on the blade or handle, is this possible? Thanking you all in advance and hoping to hear from some of you very soon.

    Regards, juno44
    Attached Files

    #2
    Looks like a nice S84/98 bayonet,1939 by Coppel GmbH Solingen matching,all parts WaA253 proofed, about blueing on first part of blade is hard to say from these pictures, could be small used. b.r.Andy

    Comment


      #3
      Hi AndyB,

      Thank you for your reply, is it normal that the bayonet itself is without maker mark
      or waffenamt?

      Regards, juno44

      Comment


        #4
        Its not typical, maybe there is 39 on spine? normally on pommel should be WaA253 twice stamped, Do You have any detailed pictures of reverse ricasso and pommel where normally would be the stamping? press button is proofed, is possible the blanko production was mixed by Coppel to realise Wehrmacht contract. Same letter i on both parts? thanks. b.r.Andy

        Comment


          #5
          SOMETHING DOESNT LOOK RIGHT

          Comment


            #6
            Hi byf45,

            What does not look right?

            Regards, Michel

            Comment


              #7
              Side by side comparison of serial numbers and other markings or areas as ricasso and pommel could help. b.r.Andy

              Comment


                #8
                Hi Andy,

                Here is a photo showing both serial numbers side by side. Beside the serial number I see no other markings on the bayonet itself. I did not check under its grips.

                Regards, juno44
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #9
                  Thanks for adding details,it looks like identical stamp, so certainly a Coppel 39, the bayonet was possible unmarked and later used in the Wehrmacht contract. Maybe there are stamps under flashguard and other parts, in that period were grips,flashguard all proofed normally. b.r.Andy

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Hi Andy,

                    Again thank you for your help.

                    Regards, juno44

                    Comment

                    Users Viewing this Thread

                    Collapse

                    There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                    Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                    Working...
                    X