Original Wustoff Rohm dagger.
The blade looks like it perhaps been sharpened and then vigorously cleaned. Exhibits a edge nick. Not a prime example for a 'Partial Rohm' IMO.
... Original Wustoff Rohm dagger. The blade looks like it perhaps been sharpened and then vigorously cleaned. Exhibits a edge nick. Not a prime example for a 'Partial Rohm' IMO. ...
As Serge noted, this blade "Exhibits a edge nick." This is the more interesting since the nick only seems to appear on the blade's reverse -- the side with the inscription -- but the obverse does not seem to show this nick, which obviously goes completely through the blade...from the reverse side??!
I'm not sure what you're seeing, Russ -- the edge nick I'm talking about can only be seen on the photos provided of the reverse side of the blade, below the last letter of the inscription's second word -- "In herzlicher kameradschaft." At least, with my eyes! The obverse side of the blade -- with the SA Motto "Alles für Deutschland" -- shows no sign of this nick.
I'm not sure what you're seeing, Russ -- the edge nick I'm talking about can only be seen on the photos provided of the reverse side of the blade, below the last letter of the inscription's second word -- "In herzlicher kameradschaft." At least, with my eyes! The obverse side of the blade -- with the SA Motto "Alles für Deutschland" -- shows no sign of this nick.
......................... The blade looks like it perhaps been sharpened and then vigorously cleaned. Exhibits a edge nick. Not a prime example for a 'Partial Rohm' IMO.
Wait for other comments.
What Serge said. To which I would add a poor IMO mouthpiece to lower grip crossguard/ fitting, seeing on one side what looks like a large air gap. Damage or wear (?) to one side of the eagle's wings that seems to have not affected the wood grip itself etc.
While others may see it differently it's not one that I personally would be happy with. FP
Comment