oorlogsspullen

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dagger help-- SS and Diplomat daggers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    thanks guys on the comments.

    I am still working on it.

    I have the money ready... but the guy didnt show up today. I have his contact info and will try tomorrow. Robert

    Comment


      #32
      Heck with that SS grab the GO !!

      Comment


        #33
        The SS is a 'as issued' Mod. 33. All nickel fittings, but NO district stamp on crossguard. Blade is a no maker, as issued on Mod. 36's.
        Just like 777's example, a interesting variant. I had one just like it from a veteran source.

        The G.O. looks period. However, I have never seen the Eickhorn logo so far down the blade. (Only means..that I haven't seen it -so means nothing). I would like to examine the G.O. 'in-hand' also the hanger. The portappe might be a repro, but perhaps not.
        This could be a very early production dagger.

        Anyone else care to comment further?


        -wagner-

        Comment


          #34
          It maybe an unmarked crossguard, but until we get better pics I see something that could be an "I" distribution mark. As I stated, better pics might reveal a nick instead of a distribution mark on the crossguard, but until then it is there...

          Comment


            #35
            Skyline, Very observant of you. You are correct.
            One will find a nick in that location where there is usually a district I, II, or III stamped. If you take a loupe to it, it will be useless, as no letter or number can be made out - but a squiggle nick of some sort is there on this very unusual and not well understood variant SS mod.-33 dagger with a mod.36 style blade.

            -wagner-
            Last edited by Serge M.; 12-08-2013, 12:27 AM.

            Comment


              #36
              As I mentioned earlier on the G.O Eickhorn logo location on the blade, here is the usual place where it's found on G.O.'s

              wagner


              Comment


                #37
                I still can't see it. We'll wait until he bought it,but it's for sure unmarked.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Something new from the past?

                  Originally posted by wags View Post
                  Skyline, Very observant of you. You are correct.
                  One will find a nick in that location where there is usually a district I, II, or III stamped. If you take a loupe to it, it will be useless, as no letter or number can be made out - but a squiggle nick of some sort is there on this very unusual and not well understood variant SS mod.-33 dagger with a mod.36 style blade.

                  -wagner-
                  Interesting. What you are talking about, sounds familiar. The mark is certainly an odd-shaped [if I recall, like a small, stylized "m" or "s" maybe?] impression in the crossguard . . . almost like an accidental [but deep for accidental!] dent or ding, and introduced on an angle - not directly struck into the cg. I may have had one of these daggers years ago, and often wondered if the mark was intentionally placed. I will say this - the mark on mine was not on the center of the cg - it was more off to the right side of the spine on the blade. In this photo, it appears to me this blade has a [similar?] mark in about the same location. Curious. Let's see if better photos turn up . . .
                  Attached Files
                  Last edited by N.C. Wyeth; 12-08-2013, 10:22 AM.

                  Comment

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                  Working...
                  X