griffinmilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

K98 Bayonet + frog

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    K98 Bayonet + frog

    Hi Guys,

    I'm thinking of adding a bayonet to my collection, a new area for me. I came across this one and I was looking for some views. What are the important things to look for if you are looking to buy a bayonet & frog.

    Thanks for your time

    regards

    James
    Attached Files

    #2
    2.
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      3.
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        Well

        I am a beginner myself. What you have here is not a K98 bayonet but rather a KS98 Mauser Bayonet, or often just called a Dress Bayonet. There are not that many fakes around, so there is not that much to worry about. One thing to always look for is poor fits of the grips and seams on the finger guards for example. The ones with some etch patterns are more tricky however. I suggest you get a book to guide you through or post the items of your interest here and we would be more than happy to help you.

        As to the piece on display, it's a nice one, but I would personally wait and get one with better plating on the hilt and finger guards. Other than that, a very nice piece.

        JAN

        Comment


          #5
          Hi Jan,

          Thanks very much for the information. So this bayonet would never have been attached to a rifle, it was worn with a dress uniform as a kind of dress dagger (or bayonet in this case). Were these private purchase items?

          Thanks

          James.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by James E. View Post
            Hi Jan,

            Thanks very much for the information. So this bayonet would never have been attached to a rifle, it was worn with a dress uniform as a kind of dress dagger (or bayonet in this case). Were these private purchase items?

            Thanks

            James.
            Hey,

            well they were generally worn on the side, as a dress accessory. However, some could be put on rifles and I have seen photos of that. However, they were not used for combat and YES, they were private purchase items. That would explain the different variations and etch patters. Such changes were not allowed for issued K98 bayonets as those were owned by the state.

            JAN

            Comment


              #7
              Hi,

              I agree with Jan, the piece in question is nice enough (maker marked by Pack and having spanner nuts for the grips) but the plating on the pommel leaves a lot to be desired. These pieces are pretty plentiful, just be patient and you'll find one that will look like new with all the attributes of this piece. Just my opinion but I think with time you'll agree.

              Comment


                #8
                Yes

                I agree with Billy :P As to the piece you have posted pictures of, here's one to compare it to (same make, type) in terms of the plating that I talked about :

                http://www.aukro.cz/item190015641_du...dak.html#photo

                JAN

                Comment

                Users Viewing this Thread

                Collapse

                There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                Working...
                X