Need opinions on this hat please, Thanks
-
-
1 -
2Comment
-
Hello Gentlemen,
Dangerous business these caps, but in my opinion, this one has a good chance to be a period original. I like what I see in the details. If the price were attractive, I might take a chance on it.
Thank you,
CurtissComment
-
It will be for sale!Comment
-
Where?
CarloComment
-
I like what i see !
NickComment
-
At the very least, it appears the sweatband has been replaced.NEC SOLI CEDITComment
-
Originally posted by stonemint View Post
The same opinion!
Depends on the price but this cap need an 100% handson autentification.
The problem is the non standard sweatband, no logo.
It looks very promissing but it remains a cap with question.
steiner99Comment
-
I'm not sure it was replaced , it coulnd be a economical sweatbend.not all erel's have the classic stirn sweat.Originally posted by stonemint View Post
CarloComment
-
As said it's a dangerous cap an for sure it need an "in-hand-deep-inspection" but from these pics it could have some good possibilities....
..yes I agree as well...IMHO the SB "could " be original to the cap....Originally posted by solo View Post
Regards
GiorgioComment
-
Hello Gentlemen,
There are some very good points raised here. I think we all agree that a thorough hands on inspection would be needed to get a better idea about this cap. The supplied pictures do not really give us much to go on regarding the sweatband or sweatshield. I was anticipating that each would have the typical Erel stamping (blind stamping in the case of the sweatshield). Without either of these tell-tale signs, I would pass on this cap as being too dangerous.
Thank you,
CurtissComment
-
Inside of hat, no maker.Comment
-
Other than the vented cockade what makes this an Erel? Could it be another maker with an Erel cockade added?Comment
-
In looking at this cap, I don't get a good "gut" feel for it - and that's all it is, really. The vented cockade and the unusual sweatband are the two things that jumped out at men from the pics.
DonComment
Comment