I've always been puzzled by the prices of tropical M40 caps.
1st, 2nd or 3rd patterns, caps with soutache, no soutache, traces of soutache, salty, unworn, date stamped, no date, maker marked or not, sun bleached etc etc. The variations and prices vary so much it's difficult to know what's a fair market price or not.
I bring the topic up because although I've been lucky enough to find a few M40's in the past, I've always wanted a heavily bleached example but the prices for those have been too high for me so far. I really don't care what pattern and date the cap is and that got me thinking about the factors that determine the prices of these caps.
1st, 2nd or 3rd patterns, caps with soutache, no soutache, traces of soutache, salty, unworn, date stamped, no date, maker marked or not, sun bleached etc etc. The variations and prices vary so much it's difficult to know what's a fair market price or not.
I bring the topic up because although I've been lucky enough to find a few M40's in the past, I've always wanted a heavily bleached example but the prices for those have been too high for me so far. I really don't care what pattern and date the cap is and that got me thinking about the factors that determine the prices of these caps.
It's a fact that 1st pattern caps with soutache command very high prices.
I realise that these 1940/ early 41 caps were made for the very first initial formation sent to Africa and therefore the only "true" Deutsches Afrikakorps or DAK caps and we've seen some amazing ones that were clearly "there" judging by the salty condition of those examples. I totally get that these caps are highly desirable and therefore expensive.
What about the unworn 1st pattern caps? made for the DAK but either never got there or ended up in some supply depot in Tripoli or Bizerte. How does that make them "DAK" caps in the true sense of the word? There is also the question whether all 1st pattern caps were solely supplied to the DAK. Greece was invaded at about the same time that the 5th Light Division and elements from the 15th Panzer Division were cobbled together in Libya to form the DAK. Were any trop caps/uniforms supplied to units in Greece at this time? If they were, does that mean that all 1st pattern caps weren't necessarily intended for the DAK and therefore do we have to re-assess the current prices of these caps?
Food for thought.
So now let's discuss 2nd and 3rd pattern caps.
Both models "could" have and were used in Africa as well as other theatres of operations. Why then are they judged to be worth a fraction of the price of 1st models? Surely all these trop caps should be judged on a case by case basis?
What I'm asking is why would a 2nd or 3rd pattern cap with solid provenance of having been worn on the head of a soldier in Africa who then became a POW be worth so much less than an earlier made cap that can not be proven to have been there, only assumed to have been due to the date of manufacture?
I read this old thread today and Ralph Heinz makes some brilliant observations about what happened to Africa veterans and what happened to their uniforms.
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=205970
It seems that the desirability and therefore price of these caps are based on some rather questionable foundations and maybe we should take a fresh look at the whole subject because Trop caps have become very very expensive even though there are quite a few on the market at the moment.
I'd really appreciate hearing your thoughts guys.
I realise that these 1940/ early 41 caps were made for the very first initial formation sent to Africa and therefore the only "true" Deutsches Afrikakorps or DAK caps and we've seen some amazing ones that were clearly "there" judging by the salty condition of those examples. I totally get that these caps are highly desirable and therefore expensive.
What about the unworn 1st pattern caps? made for the DAK but either never got there or ended up in some supply depot in Tripoli or Bizerte. How does that make them "DAK" caps in the true sense of the word? There is also the question whether all 1st pattern caps were solely supplied to the DAK. Greece was invaded at about the same time that the 5th Light Division and elements from the 15th Panzer Division were cobbled together in Libya to form the DAK. Were any trop caps/uniforms supplied to units in Greece at this time? If they were, does that mean that all 1st pattern caps weren't necessarily intended for the DAK and therefore do we have to re-assess the current prices of these caps?
Food for thought.
So now let's discuss 2nd and 3rd pattern caps.
Both models "could" have and were used in Africa as well as other theatres of operations. Why then are they judged to be worth a fraction of the price of 1st models? Surely all these trop caps should be judged on a case by case basis?
What I'm asking is why would a 2nd or 3rd pattern cap with solid provenance of having been worn on the head of a soldier in Africa who then became a POW be worth so much less than an earlier made cap that can not be proven to have been there, only assumed to have been due to the date of manufacture?
I read this old thread today and Ralph Heinz makes some brilliant observations about what happened to Africa veterans and what happened to their uniforms.
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=205970
It seems that the desirability and therefore price of these caps are based on some rather questionable foundations and maybe we should take a fresh look at the whole subject because Trop caps have become very very expensive even though there are quite a few on the market at the moment.
I'd really appreciate hearing your thoughts guys.
Comment