I wasn't aware of inconsistencies regarding my willingness to openly discuss items presented for comment, I will have to examine my conscience on that.........there done.
Unless I am frightfully mistaken, I had thought that I have proven more than willing to present arguments to support my opinions about items. Obviously, I have posted many detailed threads of photos and diagrams pointing out the traits of fake and real police insignia. To my recollection I have never made the " don't tell the fakers too much" argument. But perhaps you recall my past contributions better than I.
If you do not wish to expound on your declaration " it's rubbish" you certainly don't have to. I merely said I would be interested in hearing why it is rubbish. How that has resulted in calling me out for some alleged past sins, that I don't recall, seems rather pointless.
You and I have " history". Let's leave it at that. Getting into a name calling exercise will add nothing to honest discussion. At least "I " don't want to play.
W.Unland
Unless I am frightfully mistaken, I had thought that I have proven more than willing to present arguments to support my opinions about items. Obviously, I have posted many detailed threads of photos and diagrams pointing out the traits of fake and real police insignia. To my recollection I have never made the " don't tell the fakers too much" argument. But perhaps you recall my past contributions better than I.
If you do not wish to expound on your declaration " it's rubbish" you certainly don't have to. I merely said I would be interested in hearing why it is rubbish. How that has resulted in calling me out for some alleged past sins, that I don't recall, seems rather pointless.
You and I have " history". Let's leave it at that. Getting into a name calling exercise will add nothing to honest discussion. At least "I " don't want to play.
W.Unland
Comment