Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_b62309c868c67c3cab2b1c0c6bde36b87a1493a382096934, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 opinions about this early visor what is it ? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Billy Kramer

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

opinions about this early visor what is it ?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    opinions about this early visor what is it ?

    hello . i,m posting these pic,s for a fellow collector he has this early visor and would like to hear some opinions about it is the ,,waffenfarbe, Panzer ,Art.,or general staff ?? Thanks for looking

    Hans

    Tags: None
    #2
    Look like a nice transitional cap, could be faded Art.

    Comment

      #3
      Hello,
      I agree, it is a transitional Reichwehr to Wehrmacht visor cap, with Wehrmacht insignia. I would venture that it is panzer piping.
      Thanks,
      Curtiss

      Comment

        #4
        Looks like panzer on my screen too, but could be faded arty. Not a chance of General Staff IMO.

        Comment

          #5
          I would say Artillery in a light calibre capacity.

          Remember the Reichswehr were prohibited from having a Panzer (Armoured) arm under the treaty of Versailles so transitional Panzer

          Point 12 of the treaty is as follows:

          (12) limitation of Germany's army to 100,000 men with no conscription, no tanks, no heavy artillery, no poison-gas supplies, no aircraft and no airships;

          When Germany experimented with tanks it was in secrecy, no point in advertising it with coloured piped caps.

          Trying to sell as anything other than Artillery would prove to be difficult in my very humble opinion.

          However, I will probably be proved wrong

          J T
          Last edited by sturmbannfuhrer; 07-22-2008, 06:21 AM. Reason: add in additional point about tanks

          Comment

            #6
            Nice assesment, makes sense. I was also thinking panzer, but obviously with flawed reasoning and lack of a brainprocess. Jacques

            Originally posted by sturmbannfuhrer View Post
            I would say Artillery in a light calibre capacity.

            Remember the Reichwehr were prohibited from having a Panzer (Armoured) arm under the treaty of Versailles so transitional Panzer

            Point 12 of the treaty is as follows:

            (12) limitation of Germany's army to 100,000 men with no conscription, no tanks, no heavy artillery, no poison-gas supplies, no aircraft and no airships;

            When Germany experimented with tanks it was in secrecy, no point in advertising it with coloured piped caps.

            Trying to sell as anything other than Artillery would prove to be difficult in my very humble opinion.

            However, I will probably be proved wrong

            J T

            Comment

              #7
              hello friends. thanks for your comments

              regards Hans

              Comment

              Previous template Next

              Users Viewing this Thread

              Collapse

              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

              Working...
              X