Ss

[blizge]

Hello

Please help.

everything is good here? Thanks


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/194/dscn6957m.jpg/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/94/dscn6958nd.jpg/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/9/dscn6959z.jpg/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/215/dscn6960x.jpg/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/9/dscn6961yi.jpg/

[blizge]

[ivanjoaquin]

The buckle is original, the strange thing is that the markings are under the prongs post , intermediate type?
Regards
Ivan

[cossack1648]

Original buckle. Pity about broken prong.
Jack

[musketier]

The buckle is original, the strange thing is that the markings are under the prongs post , intermediate type?
Regards
Ivan

Hello All,

@ivanjoaquin...this is the typ 2, according to JP !
But as JP can certainly write more.


With best regards,

Raphael

[ivanjoaquin]

I think that this catch is the same one that the first variant with marking by the catch
Regards
Iván

[Jean Pierre Redeuilh]

I think that this catch is the same one that the first variant with marking by the catch
Regards
Iván

The "Types" I introduced years ago was based on marking location. Only Type one has marking by the catch (scarcer type). The Type 2 (common) has marking under the postsleeve assembly. So Raphael is 100% correct.

[ivanjoaquin]

The "Types" I introduced years ago was based on marking location. Only Type one has marking by the catch (scarcer type). The Type 2 (common) has marking under the postsleeve assembly. So Raphael is 100% correct.

Yes, the type is defined by the position of the marking, in this case it is a 155/40 type 2 (similar to the 155/43 type 1) but I insist that catch is the same one as in 155/40 type 1
Regards
Ivan

[Jean Pierre Redeuilh]

I insist that catch is the same one as in 155/40 type 1
Regards
Ivan

Correct.
My input was just to stress that there was not enough difference to generate another Type.

[ivanjoaquin]

Thanks Jean Pierre
Regards
Ivan